THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# FRED BODALY BC 0478 9 1 404 323 532 60.71% 2 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 8 2 394 321 508 63.18% 3* NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 7 2 333 267 396 67.42% 4* BILL WHITNACK BC 3339 7 2 321 234 434 53.91% 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 4 5 293 240 476 50.42% 6** JOHN COLLIN BC 0199 3 6 268 251 476 52.73% 7** JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 3 6 218 191 400 47.75% 8***EARL MORRIS BC 3302 2 7 239 184 400 46.00% 9***EARLE GILLARD BC 4212 2 7 192 144 364 39.56% 10 GORDON SNYDER BC 0460 1 8 212 190 426 44.60% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# FRED BODALY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOHN COLLIN W 42/36 38 64 59.37 8 EARL MORRIS W 44/29 26 48 54.16 4 BILL WHITNACK W 41/10 23 32 71.87 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/19 33 52 63.46 10 GORDON SNYDER W 42/25 31 52 59.61 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/27 32 56 57.14 2 WILF GREGORY W 43/34 38 64 59.37 3 NEIL YASKOW L 30/40 40 72 55.55 9 EARLE GILLARD W 40/4 22 28 78.57 2 WILF GREGORY W 40/34 40 64 62.50 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 323 532 60.71 2 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 EARL MORRIS W 40/38 34 54 62.96 4 BILL WHITNACK W 41/23 30 46 65.21 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/10 27 46 58.69 6 JOHN COLLIN W 40/9 21 32 65.62 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/29 37 56 66.07 9 EARLE GILLARD W 44/0 19 26 73.07 1 FRED BODALY L 34/43 35 64 54.68 10 GORDON SNYDER W 41/13 32 52 61.53 3 NEIL YASKOW W 40/22 49 68 72.05 1 FRED BODALY L 34/40 37 64 57.81 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 321 508 63.18 3* NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/0 18 20 90.00 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/13 26 40 65.00 10 GORDON SNYDER W 42/3 19 24 79.16 4 BILL WHITNACK L 28/42 32 54 59.25 6 JOHN COLLIN W 40/16 35 50 70.00 8 EARL MORRIS W 40/7 29 34 85.29 9 EARLE GILLARD W 40/13 20 34 58.82 1 FRED BODALY W 40/30 45 72 62.50 2 WILF GREGORY L 22/40 43 68 63.23 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 63%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 267 396 67.42 4* BILL WHITNACK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 EARLE GILLARD W 42/19 22 34 64.70 2 WILF GREGORY L 23/41 25 46 54.34 1 FRED BODALY L 10/41 13 32 40.62 3 NEIL YASKOW W 42/28 37 54 68.51 8 EARL MORRIS W 40/12 19 36 52.77 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/26 24 48 50.00 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 43/32 31 62 50.00 6 JOHN COLLIN W 40/33 30 58 51.72 10 GORDON SNYDER W 40/37 33 64 51.56 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 51%) TOTALS W 7 L 2 234 434 53.91 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 GORDON SNYDER W 42/22 26 42 61.90 3 NEIL YASKOW L 13/41 17 40 42.50 6 JOHN COLLIN W 42/23 33 52 63.46 8 EARL MORRIS W 40/27 24 56 42.85 2 WILF GREGORY L 29/40 34 56 60.71 1 FRED BODALY L 27/41 28 56 50.00 4 BILL WHITNACK L 32/43 28 62 45.16 9 EARLE GILLARD W 41/37 25 58 43.10 7 JOHN THORNTON L 27/44 25 54 46.29 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 50%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 240 476 50.42 6** JOHN COLLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 FRED BODALY L 36/42 37 64 57.81 9 EARLE GILLARD W 41/27 29 60 48.33 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 23/42 27 52 51.92 2 WILF GREGORY L 9/40 12 32 37.50 3 NEIL YASKOW L 16/40 26 50 52.00 10 GORDON SNYDER W 40/17 22 42 52.38 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/19 38 60 63.33 4 BILL WHITNACK L 33/40 27 58 46.55 8 EARL MORRIS L 30/40 33 58 56.89 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 51%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 251 476 52.73 7** JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 NEIL YASKOW L 0/40 5 20 25.00 10 GORDON SNYDER W 42/25 26 54 48.14 2 WILF GREGORY L 10/40 19 46 41.30 1 FRED BODALY L 19/41 25 52 48.07 9 EARLE GILLARD W 45/7 23 32 71.87 4 BILL WHITNACK L 26/41 19 48 39.58 6 JOHN COLLIN L 19/40 32 60 53.33 8 EARL MORRIS L 13/41 12 34 35.29 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 44/27 30 54 55.55 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 50%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 191 400 47.75 8*** EARL MORRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 WILF GREGORY L 38/40 34 54 62.96 1 FRED BODALY L 29/44 21 48 43.75 9 EARLE GILLARD L 19/40 11 38 28.94 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 27/40 17 56 30.35 4 BILL WHITNACK L 12/40 10 36 27.77 3 NEIL YASKOW L 7/40 18 34 52.94 10 GORDON SNYDER L 26/41 18 42 42.85 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/13 20 34 58.82 6 JOHN COLLIN W 40/30 35 58 60.34 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 54%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 184 400 46.00 9*** EARLE GILLARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BILL WHITNACK L 19/42 15 34 44.11 6 JOHN COLLIN L 27/41 26 60 43.33 8 EARL MORRIS W 40/19 16 38 42.10 10 GORDON SNYDER W 45/29 27 54 50.00 7 JOHN THORNTON L 7/45 10 32 31.25 2 WILF GREGORY L 0/44 6 26 23.07 3 NEIL YASKOW L 13/40 11 34 32.35 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 37/41 23 58 39.65 1 FRED BODALY L 4/40 10 28 35.71 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 54%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 144 364 39.56 10 GORDON SNYDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 22/42 20 42 47.61 7 JOHN THORNTON L 25/42 19 54 35.18 3 NEIL YASKOW L 3/42 6 24 25.00 9 EARLE GILLARD L 29/45 24 54 44.44 1 FRED BODALY L 25/42 25 52 48.07 6 JOHN COLLIN L 17/40 16 42 38.09 8 EARL MORRIS W 41/26 24 42 57.14 2 WILF GREGORY L 13/41 25 52 48.07 4 BILL WHITNACK L 37/40 31 64 48.43 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 50%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 190 426 44.60 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 LES SCHNEIDER BC 3146 12 0 492 253 468 54.05% 2 BOB HOGAN BC 2938 8 4 423 237 536 44.21% 3 ARNOLD RODE BC 4985 3 9 292 161 530 30.37% 4 HANK HILDEBRAND BC 3991 1 11 163 89 458 19.43% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 LES SCHNEIDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 41/8 16 30 53.33 3 ARNOLD RODE W 43/1 17 24 70.83 2 BOB HOGAN W 40/32 24 52 46.15 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 43/4 16 28 57.14 3 ARNOLD RODE W 40/19 25 44 56.81 2 BOB HOGAN W 40/26 27 60 45.00 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 40/12 21 36 58.33 3 ARNOLD RODE W 40/4 18 44 40.90 2 BOB HOGAN W 41/15 27 42 64.28 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 40/16 13 28 46.42 3 ARNOLD RODE W 41/9 21 32 65.62 2 BOB HOGAN W 43/20 28 48 58.33 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 12 L 0 253 468 54.05 2 BOB HOGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ARNOLD RODE W 42/14 20 46 43.47 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 40/4 16 28 57.14 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 32/40 22 52 42.30 3 ARNOLD RODE W 40/36 24 52 46.15 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 41/6 16 28 57.14 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 26/40 24 60 40.00 3 ARNOLD RODE W 42/29 18 42 42.85 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 41/12 16 42 38.09 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 15/41 19 42 45.23 3 ARNOLD RODE W 41/21 24 52 46.15 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 43/19 18 44 40.90 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 20/43 20 48 41.66 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 237 536 44.21 3 ARNOLD RODE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB HOGAN L 14/42 10 46 21.73 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 1/43 3 24 12.50 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 41/3 12 32 37.50 2 BOB HOGAN L 36/40 21 52 40.38 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 19/40 16 44 36.36 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 42/18 14 46 30.43 2 BOB HOGAN L 29/42 14 42 33.33 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 4/40 8 44 18.18 4 HANK HILDEBRAND L 34/44 17 72 23.61 2 BOB HOGAN L 21/41 18 52 34.61 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 9/41 10 32 31.25 4 HANK HILDEBRAND W 42/17 18 44 40.90 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 161 530 30.37 4 HANK HILDEBRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 8/41 6 30 20.00 2 BOB HOGAN L 4/40 5 28 17.85 3 ARNOLD RODE L 3/41 1 32 3.12 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 4/43 4 28 14.28 2 BOB HOGAN L 6/41 4 28 14.28 3 ARNOLD RODE L 18/42 7 46 15.21 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 12/40 12 36 33.33 2 BOB HOGAN L 12/41 6 42 14.28 3 ARNOLD RODE W 44/34 18 72 25.00 1 LES SCHNEIDER L 16/40 5 28 17.85 2 BOB HOGAN L 19/43 11 44 25.00 3 ARNOLD RODE L 17/42 10 44 22.72 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 89 458 19.43 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# BILL BROWN BC 4916 8 3 380 192 518 37.06% 2 BOB CONNOR BC 0392 7 4 337 153 476 32.14% 3 TOM HAWKINS BC 3956 6 4 318 163 454 35.90% 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON BC 3148 4 6 300 160 476 33.61% 5* TED KUPFERSHMID BC 0507 3 7 253 132 452 29.20% 6* TED PETERS BC 4811 3 7 278 130 460 28.26% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# BILL BROWN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/19 16 40 40.00 3 TOM HAWKINS L 27/37 19 54 35.18 2 BOB CONNOR L 32/38 18 50 36.00 6 TED PETERS W 35/24 17 50 34.00 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 36/27 22 64 34.37 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/18 16 40 40.00 3 TOM HAWKINS W 37/23 17 48 35.41 2 BOB CONNOR W 39/21 15 34 44.11 6 TED PETERS W 36/31 21 52 40.38 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 29/38 15 52 28.84 2 BOB CONNOR W 37/12 16 34 47.05 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 8 L 3 192 518 37.06 2 BOB CONNOR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TED PETERS W 37/32 15 46 32.60 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/19 13 36 36.11 1 BILL BROWN W 38/32 17 50 34.00 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 37/32 17 42 40.47 3 TOM HAWKINS W 36/34 22 56 39.28 6 TED PETERS L 24/35 9 50 18.00 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 36/9 14 34 41.17 1 BILL BROWN L 21/39 8 34 23.52 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 35/31 18 48 37.50 3 TOM HAWKINS L 26/39 12 46 26.08 1 BILL BROWN L 12/37 8 34 23.52 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 7 L 4 153 476 32.14 3 TOM HAWKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 35/25 14 40 35.00 1 BILL BROWN W 37/27 21 54 38.88 6 TED PETERS W 35/6 13 24 54.16 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/28 20 52 38.46 2 BOB CONNOR L 34/36 22 56 39.28 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 13/36 8 40 20.00 1 BILL BROWN L 23/37 12 48 25.00 6 TED PETERS W 35/29 14 42 33.33 5 TED KUPFERSHMID L 32/37 22 52 42.30 2 BOB CONNOR W 39/26 17 46 36.95 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 39%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 163 454 35.90 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TOM HAWKINS L 25/35 11 40 27.50 6 TED PETERS W 35/33 16 54 29.62 5 TED KUPFERSHMID L 18/38 9 48 18.75 2 BOB CONNOR L 32/37 15 42 35.71 1 BILL BROWN L 27/36 20 64 31.25 3 TOM HAWKINS W 36/13 17 40 42.50 6 TED PETERS L 23/36 18 40 45.00 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 35/20 19 48 39.58 2 BOB CONNOR L 31/35 17 48 35.41 1 BILL BROWN W 38/29 18 52 34.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 160 476 33.61 5* TED KUPFERSHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BILL BROWN L 19/37 10 40 25.00 2 BOB CONNOR L 19/35 8 36 22.22 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 38/18 11 48 22.91 3 TOM HAWKINS L 28/35 17 52 32.69 6 TED PETERS L 28/37 16 62 25.80 1 BILL BROWN L 18/35 12 40 30.00 2 BOB CONNOR L 9/36 7 34 20.58 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 20/35 13 48 27.08 3 TOM HAWKINS W 37/32 21 52 40.38 6 TED PETERS W 37/15 17 40 42.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 132 452 29.20 6* TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB CONNOR L 32/37 11 46 23.91 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 33/35 16 54 29.62 3 TOM HAWKINS L 6/35 3 24 12.50 1 BILL BROWN L 24/35 14 50 28.00 5 TED KUPFERSHMID W 37/28 16 62 25.80 2 BOB CONNOR W 35/24 12 50 24.00 4 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 36/23 21 40 52.50 3 TOM HAWKINS L 29/35 13 42 30.95 1 BILL BROWN L 31/36 17 52 32.69 5 TED KUPFERSHMID L 15/37 7 40 17.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 32%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 130 460 28.26 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ROY WELLWOOD BC 1508 10 0 324 125 344 36.33% 2* DON REED BC 3150 6 4 266 106 386 27.46% 3* ED MORIGEAU BC 0800 6 4 268 97 364 26.64% 4** DON KENNARD BC 0519 4 6 204 81 358 22.62% 5** FRED HUHTALA BC 0074 4 6 219 78 354 22.03% 6 FRED MELN BC 2821 0 10 138 56 338 16.56% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ROY WELLWOOD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 FRED MELN W 32/14 13 38 34.21 3 ED MORIGEAU W 33/18 12 40 30.00 4 DON KENNARD W 31/23 15 46 32.60 2 DON REED W 32/19 14 30 46.66 5 FRED HUHTALA W 31/4 10 28 35.71 6 FRED MELN W 32/9 10 24 41.66 3 ED MORIGEAU W 35/18 11 42 26.19 4 DON KENNARD W 32/1 11 22 50.00 2 DON REED W 34/21 17 38 44.73 5 FRED HUHTALA W 32/25 12 36 33.33 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 125 344 36.33 2* DON REED - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ED MORIGEAU W 33/26 15 46 32.60 4 DON KENNARD W 30/24 12 50 24.00 5 FRED HUHTALA W 31/16 10 42 23.80 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 19/32 11 30 36.66 6 FRED MELN W 32/13 9 30 30.00 3 ED MORIGEAU W 30/18 11 40 27.50 4 DON KENNARD L 24/30 8 38 21.05 5 FRED HUHTALA L 15/32 8 36 22.22 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 21/34 12 38 31.57 6 FRED MELN W 31/9 10 36 27.77 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 106 386 27.46 3* ED MORIGEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DON REED L 26/33 12 46 26.08 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 18/33 8 40 20.00 6 FRED MELN W 32/11 12 24 50.00 5 FRED HUHTALA W 31/18 12 38 31.57 4 DON KENNARD W 33/9 14 38 36.84 2 DON REED L 18/30 6 40 15.00 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 18/35 6 42 14.28 6 FRED MELN W 32/28 11 40 27.50 5 FRED HUHTALA W 30/20 7 34 20.58 4 DON KENNARD W 30/14 9 22 40.90 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 97 364 26.64 4** DON KENNARD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 FRED HUHTALA L 11/31 3 42 7.14 2 DON REED L 24/30 12 50 24.00 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 23/31 12 46 26.08 6 FRED MELN W 30/18 12 36 33.33 3 ED MORIGEAU L 9/33 7 38 18.42 5 FRED HUHTALA W 31/5 9 26 34.61 2 DON REED W 30/24 13 38 34.21 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 1/32 2 22 9.09 6 FRED MELN W 31/13 7 38 18.42 3 ED MORIGEAU L 14/30 4 22 18.18 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 81 358 22.62 5** FRED HUHTALA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DON KENNARD W 31/11 5 42 11.90 6 FRED MELN W 34/10 10 36 27.77 2 DON REED L 16/31 7 42 16.66 3 ED MORIGEAU L 18/31 10 38 26.31 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 4/31 3 28 10.71 4 DON KENNARD L 5/31 1 26 3.84 6 FRED MELN W 34/13 16 36 44.44 2 DON REED W 32/15 12 36 33.33 3 ED MORIGEAU L 20/30 6 34 17.64 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 25/32 8 36 22.22 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 78 354 22.03 6 FRED MELN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 14/32 7 38 18.42 5 FRED HUHTALA L 10/34 3 36 8.33 3 ED MORIGEAU L 11/32 5 24 20.83 4 DON KENNARD L 18/30 5 36 13.88 2 DON REED L 13/32 4 30 13.33 1 ROY WELLWOOD L 9/32 3 24 12.50 5 FRED HUHTALA L 13/34 10 36 27.77 3 ED MORIGEAU L 28/32 10 40 25.00 4 DON KENNARD L 13/31 3 38 7.89 2 DON REED L 9/31 6 36 16.66 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 56 338 16.56 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 JUNIORS - CLASS A (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RANDY SCHAEFER - DC BC 0404 11 1 424 261 526 49.61% 2 DANIELLE VALLEE BC 3282 7 5 372 216 468 46.15% 3* CHRIS ALDRIDGE BC 3649 5 7 356 216 536 40.29% 4* KYLE FORD BC 0086 5 7 306 207 572 36.18% 5 KATRINA BREUER BC 0581 2 10 230 113 506 22.33% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RANDY SCHAEFER - DC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 37/21 23 52 44.23 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 25/37 14 42 33.33 4 KYLE FORD W 35/19 18 44 40.90 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 37/28 33 56 58.92 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 37/29 17 50 34.00 2 DANIELLE VALLEE W 35/19 19 38 50.00 4 KYLE FORD W 37/7 20 32 62.50 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 36/29 31 52 59.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 36/14 14 28 50.00 2 DANIELLE VALLEE W 35/22 31 50 62.00 4 KYLE FORD W 36/19 24 44 54.54 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 38/17 17 38 44.73 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 261 526 49.61 2 DANIELLE VALLEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 KATRINA BREUER W 39/14 19 38 50.00 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE L 10/37 9 30 30.00 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC W 37/25 18 42 42.85 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 KYLE FORD W 37/3 18 30 60.00 5 KATRINA BREUER W 35/10 13 28 46.42 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 36/33 22 44 50.00 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 19/35 13 38 34.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 KYLE FORD L 32/35 31 66 46.96 5 KATRINA BREUER W 37/0 12 20 60.00 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 35/18 16 36 44.44 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 22/35 27 50 54.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 KYLE FORD L 33/36 18 46 39.13 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 216 468 46.15 3* CHRIS ALDRIDGE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 KYLE FORD W 35/15 15 38 39.47 2 DANIELLE VALLEE W 37/10 16 30 53.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 35/21 12 38 31.57 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 28/37 32 56 57.14 4 KYLE FORD L 28/37 18 60 30.00 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 33/36 19 44 43.18 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 37/11 15 40 37.50 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 29/36 28 52 53.84 4 KYLE FORD W 38/30 25 52 48.07 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 18/35 12 36 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER L 21/36 13 52 25.00 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 17/38 11 38 28.94 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 216 536 40.29 4* KYLE FORD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE L 15/35 12 38 31.57 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 36/29 20 52 38.46 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 19/35 14 44 31.81 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 3/37 8 30 26.66 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 37/28 23 60 38.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER W 36/10 17 42 40.47 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 7/37 11 32 34.37 2 DANIELLE VALLEE W 35/32 31 66 46.96 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE L 30/38 21 52 40.38 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 KATRINA BREUER L 33/35 12 66 18.18 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 19/36 19 44 43.18 2 DANIELLE VALLEE W 36/33 19 46 41.30 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 207 572 36.18 5 KATRINA BREUER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 14/39 11 38 28.94 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 21/37 17 52 32.69 4 KYLE FORD L 29/36 16 52 30.76 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE L 21/35 7 38 18.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 10/35 5 28 17.85 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 29/37 14 50 28.00 4 KYLE FORD L 10/36 9 42 21.42 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE L 11/37 5 40 12.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 DANIELLE VALLEE L 0/37 0 20 0.00 1 RA SCHAEFER - DC L 14/36 5 28 17.85 4 KYLE FORD W 35/33 9 66 13.63 3 CHRIS ALDRIDGE W 36/21 15 52 28.84 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 22%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 113 506 22.33 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 JUNIORS - CLASS B (30Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS BC 0721 9 1 300 96 350 27.42% 2* DAVID HARRIS BC 7 3 226 77 382 20.15% 3* TANYA LLOYD BC 0725 7 3 215 66 404 16.33% 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT BC 0503 4 6 212 61 368 16.57% 5 DARREN WHITFORD BC 0637 2 8 130 37 368 10.05% 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT BC 0504 1 9 168 44 384 11.45% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 32/7 8 34 23.52 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 30/10 9 30 30.00 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 30/13 10 32 31.25 3 TANYA LLOYD W 28/9 11 40 27.50 2 DAVID HARRIS W 30/22 9 36 25.00 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 30/13 8 30 26.66 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 30/21 9 40 22.50 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 30/8 8 28 28.57 3 TANYA LLOYD L 25/26 12 40 30.00 2 DAVID HARRIS W 35/14 12 40 30.00 (Was 11%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 96 350 27.42 2* DAVID HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 18/17 9 40 22.50 3 TANYA LLOYD W 24/15 9 40 22.50 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 31/12 10 34 29.41 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 17/15 6 40 15.00 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 22/30 7 36 19.44 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 25/15 8 40 20.00 3 TANYA LLOYD L 15/25 4 40 10.00 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 30/14 10 40 25.00 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 30/6 7 32 21.87 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 14/35 7 40 17.50 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 77 382 20.15 3* TANYA LLOYD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 25/22 5 44 11.36 2 DAVID HARRIS L 15/24 7 40 17.50 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 23/14 5 40 12.50 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 9/28 6 40 15.00 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 20/30 6 40 15.00 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 26/19 5 40 12.50 2 DAVID HARRIS W 25/15 5 40 12.50 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 22/20 6 40 15.00 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS W 26/25 12 40 30.00 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 24/22 9 40 22.50 (Was 9%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 66 404 16.33 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DAVID HARRIS L 17/18 9 40 22.50 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 31/4 7 32 21.87 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 13/30 3 32 9.37 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 28/17 8 40 20.00 3 TANYA LLOYD W 30/20 7 40 17.50 2 DAVID HARRIS L 15/25 5 40 12.50 5 DARREN WHITFORD L 18/22 4 40 10.00 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 8/30 3 28 10.71 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 30/11 7 36 19.44 3 TANYA LLOYD L 22/24 8 40 20.00 (Was 4%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 61 368 16.57 5 DARREN WHITFORD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 7/32 3 34 8.82 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 4/31 2 32 6.25 3 TANYA LLOYD L 14/23 3 40 7.50 2 DAVID HARRIS L 15/17 6 40 15.00 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 11/31 6 40 15.00 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 13/30 3 30 10.00 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 22/18 5 40 12.50 3 TANYA LLOYD L 20/22 4 40 10.00 2 DAVID HARRIS L 6/30 1 32 3.12 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 18/11 4 40 10.00 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 37 368 10.05 6 ZANE TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 TANYA LLOYD L 22/25 5 44 11.36 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 10/30 3 30 10.00 2 DAVID HARRIS L 12/31 3 34 8.82 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 17/28 3 40 7.50 5 DARREN WHITFORD W 31/11 9 40 22.50 3 TANYA LLOYD L 19/26 4 40 10.00 1 CHRSTINE SPARKS L 21/30 8 40 20.00 2 DAVID HARRIS L 14/30 4 40 10.00 4 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 11/30 2 36 5.55 5 DARREN WHITFORD L 11/18 3 40 7.50 (Was 9%) TOTALS W 1 L 9 44 384 11.45 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# WALTER KINAKIN - DC BC 0744 9 2 420 293 512 57.22% 2* JERRY MELISSA BC 0534 7 3 372 289 482 59.95% 3* GORDON BUTTS BC 4202 7 3 376 253 490 51.63% 4 ERICH SCHAEFER BC 0405 6 3 335 263 468 56.19% 5 LLOYD REYKLIN BC 0369 5 4 318 202 388 52.06% 6** JIM BALL BC 3443 4 5 308 224 408 54.90% 7** DENNIS MUSTCHIN BC 2811 4 5 262 204 454 44.93% 8 MUNJ MANHAS BC 3968 3 6 218 193 396 48.73% 9 VIC VALLEE BC 2916 2 7 177 182 402 45.27% 10 SHANE GREENSIDE BC 0158 0 9 57 77 284 27.11% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# WALTER KINAKIN - DC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 41/1 20 24 83.33 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN W 40/14 28 46 60.86 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 31/41 28 54 51.85 9 VIC VALLEE W 42/11 31 44 70.45 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 41/10 24 36 66.66 3 GORDON BUTTS W 45/34 40 74 54.05 5 LLOYD REYKLIN L 13/40 10 32 31.25 2 JERRY MELISSA W 44/32 37 58 63.79 6 JIM BALL W 41/22 26 46 56.52 3 GORDON BUTTS W 42/25 20 42 47.61 2 JERRY MELISSA W 40/31 29 56 51.78 (Was 56%) TOTALS W 9 L 2 293 512 57.22 2* JERRY MELISSA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 40/16 24 38 63.15 3 GORDON BUTTS L 22/41 26 52 50.00 9 VIC VALLEE W 41/30 36 62 58.06 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 40/9 21 30 70.00 4 ERICH SCHAEFER W 41/23 37 52 71.15 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN W 40/28 31 54 57.40 6 JIM BALL W 40/17 25 38 65.78 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 32/44 34 58 58.62 5 LLOYD REYKLIN W 45/14 27 42 64.28 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 31/40 28 56 50.00 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 289 482 59.95 3* GORDON BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JIM BALL W 41/38 27 48 56.25 2 JERRY MELISSA W 41/22 31 52 59.61 5 LLOYD REYKLIN W 42/35 26 52 50.00 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN L 28/41 22 54 40.74 9 VIC VALLEE W 42/7 21 32 65.62 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 34/45 38 74 51.35 4 ERICH SCHAEFER W 42/26 38 66 57.57 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 40/1 13 24 54.16 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 41/19 24 46 52.17 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 25/42 13 42 30.95 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 55%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 253 490 51.63 4 ERICH SCHAEFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN W 45/11 26 44 59.09 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 43/3 17 26 65.38 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC W 41/31 31 54 57.40 5 LLOYD REYKLIN W 40/29 33 58 56.89 2 JERRY MELISSA L 23/41 31 52 59.61 8 MUNJ MANHAS L 33/40 26 56 46.42 3 GORDON BUTTS L 26/42 33 66 50.00 6 JIM BALL W 40/36 37 64 57.81 9 VIC VALLEE W 44/8 29 48 60.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 49%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 263 468 56.19 5 LLOYD REYKLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 VIC VALLEE W 40/9 17 28 60.71 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 40/13 27 38 71.05 3 GORDON BUTTS L 35/42 25 52 48.07 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 29/40 28 58 48.27 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 43/3 20 28 71.42 6 JIM BALL W 43/30 28 48 58.33 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC W 40/13 18 32 56.25 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN L 34/41 23 62 37.09 2 JERRY MELISSA L 14/45 16 42 38.09 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 56%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 202 388 52.06 6** JIM BALL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 GORDON BUTTS L 38/41 25 48 52.08 9 VIC VALLEE W 40/11 28 40 70.00 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 45/12 21 36 58.33 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 40/13 28 42 66.66 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN W 40/20 23 46 50.00 5 LLOYD REYKLIN L 30/43 24 48 50.00 2 JERRY MELISSA L 17/40 18 38 47.36 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 36/40 36 64 56.25 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 22/41 21 46 45.65 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 59%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 224 408 54.90 7** DENNIS MUSTCHIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 11/45 15 44 34.09 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 14/40 19 46 41.30 8 MUNJ MANHAS W 40/23 25 52 48.07 3 GORDON BUTTS W 41/28 28 54 51.85 6 JIM BALL L 20/40 17 46 36.95 2 JERRY MELISSA L 28/40 27 54 50.00 9 VIC VALLEE L 23/40 24 52 46.15 5 LLOYD REYKLIN W 41/34 29 62 46.77 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 44/7 20 44 45.45 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 48%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 204 454 44.93 8 MUNJ MANHAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JERRY MELISSA L 16/40 18 38 47.36 5 LLOYD REYKLIN L 13/40 19 38 50.00 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN L 23/40 21 52 40.38 6 JIM BALL L 13/40 20 42 47.61 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 10/41 14 36 38.88 4 ERICH SCHAEFER W 40/33 30 56 53.57 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 42/7 21 32 65.62 9 VIC VALLEE W 42/20 32 56 57.14 3 GORDON BUTTS L 19/41 18 46 39.13 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 54%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 193 396 48.73 9 VIC VALLEE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LLOYD REYKLIN L 9/40 9 28 32.14 6 JIM BALL L 11/40 19 40 47.50 2 JERRY MELISSA L 30/41 30 62 48.38 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 11/42 21 44 47.72 3 GORDON BUTTS L 7/42 10 32 31.25 10 SHANE GREENSIDE W 41/14 22 40 55.00 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN W 40/23 30 52 57.69 8 MUNJ MANHAS L 20/42 24 56 42.85 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 8/44 17 48 35.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 51%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 182 402 45.27 10 SHANE GREENSIDE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 WAL KINAKIN - DC L 1/41 7 24 29.16 4 ERICH SCHAEFER L 3/43 5 26 19.23 6 JIM BALL L 12/45 12 36 33.33 2 JERRY MELISSA L 9/40 11 30 36.66 5 LLOYD REYKLIN L 3/43 8 28 28.57 9 VIC VALLEE L 14/41 14 40 35.00 8 MUNJ MANHAS L 7/42 9 32 28.12 3 GORDON BUTTS L 1/40 2 24 8.33 7 DENNIS MUSTCHIN L 7/44 9 44 20.45 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 48%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 77 284 27.11 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# MIKE THOMPSON BC 3636 9 1 383 219 458 47.81% 2 ERNIE TRUDEL BC 3307 8 2 378 218 446 48.87% 3* HORST HESSE BC 4814 6 3 297 187 396 47.22% 4* VICTOR NOEL BC 4000 6 3 314 183 416 43.99% 5 LOU BUSCH BC 4857 5 4 303 201 448 44.86% 6 DAVE ARNOLD BC 3633 4 5 305 180 444 40.54% 7 LARRY WESTMAN BC 3957 3 6 215 161 418 38.51% 8** LEN THOMPSON BC 3998 2 7 225 159 444 35.81% 9** LLOYD MILTON BC 3606 2 7 237 147 430 34.18% 10 MURRAY RAYNER BC 4856 1 8 213 148 412 35.92% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# MIKE THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 LOU BUSCH L 14/40 13 36 36.11 2 ERNIE TRUDEL W 40/7 17 24 70.83 3 HORST HESSE W 41/21 24 50 48.00 4 VICTOR NOEL W 40/37 25 56 44.64 6 DAVE ARNOLD W 42/29 27 48 56.25 9 LLOYD MILTON W 41/4 19 34 55.88 8 LEN THOMPSON W 40/21 23 52 44.23 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 43/19 17 44 38.63 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 40/13 21 44 47.72 2 ERNIE TRUDEL W 42/38 33 70 47.14 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 219 458 47.81 2 ERNIE TRUDEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 DAVE ARNOLD W 41/21 21 46 45.65 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 7/40 6 24 25.00 9 LLOYD MILTON W 43/20 22 52 42.30 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/16 24 42 57.14 8 LEN THOMPSON W 40/11 19 38 50.00 5 LOU BUSCH W 45/37 27 52 51.92 3 HORST HESSE W 40/19 24 38 63.15 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 42/7 20 36 55.55 4 VICTOR NOEL W 41/16 23 48 47.91 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 38/42 32 70 45.71 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 218 446 48.87 3* HORST HESSE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 43/10 21 34 61.76 6 DAVE ARNOLD L 10/40 9 36 25.00 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 21/41 18 50 36.00 9 LLOYD MILTON W 40/31 26 54 48.14 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 40/5 20 34 58.82 8 LEN THOMPSON W 41/18 21 46 45.65 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 19/40 18 38 47.36 4 VICTOR NOEL W 42/13 28 48 58.33 5 LOU BUSCH W 41/30 26 56 46.42 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 45%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 187 396 47.22 4* VICTOR NOEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 LLOYD MILTON W 43/24 15 40 37.50 8 LEN THOMPSON W 42/13 25 50 50.00 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 40/12 29 50 58.00 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 37/40 23 56 41.07 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 42/24 21 50 42.00 6 DAVE ARNOLD W 41/25 20 50 40.00 5 LOU BUSCH W 40/4 14 24 58.33 3 HORST HESSE L 13/42 19 48 39.58 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 16/41 17 48 35.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 47%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 183 416 43.99 5 LOU BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MIKE THOMPSON W 40/14 21 36 58.33 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 42/26 26 48 54.16 6 DAVE ARNOLD W 44/36 32 66 48.48 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 43/18 20 44 45.45 9 LLOYD MILTON L 23/40 22 60 36.66 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 37/45 24 52 46.15 4 VICTOR NOEL L 4/40 2 24 8.33 8 LEN THOMPSON W 40/38 31 62 50.00 3 HORST HESSE L 30/41 23 56 41.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 201 448 44.86 6 DAVE ARNOLD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 21/41 15 46 32.60 3 HORST HESSE W 40/10 17 36 47.22 5 LOU BUSCH L 36/44 25 66 37.87 8 LEN THOMPSON L 32/41 20 54 37.03 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 29/42 20 48 41.66 4 VICTOR NOEL L 25/41 17 50 34.00 7 LARRY WESTMAN W 41/37 26 64 40.62 9 LLOYD MILTON W 40/16 20 38 52.63 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/17 20 42 47.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 180 444 40.54 7 LARRY WESTMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 LEN THOMPSON W 40/10 19 44 43.18 9 LLOYD MILTON W 42/35 24 54 44.44 4 VICTOR NOEL L 12/40 21 50 42.00 5 LOU BUSCH L 18/43 13 44 29.54 3 HORST HESSE L 5/40 10 34 29.41 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 41/28 22 48 45.83 6 DAVE ARNOLD L 37/41 25 64 39.06 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 7/42 11 36 30.55 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 13/40 16 44 36.36 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 41%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 161 418 38.51 8** LEN THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 LARRY WESTMAN L 10/40 9 44 20.45 4 VICTOR NOEL L 13/42 17 50 34.00 10 MURRAY RAYNER L 30/42 21 52 40.38 6 DAVE ARNOLD W 41/32 24 54 44.44 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 11/40 9 38 23.68 3 HORST HESSE L 18/41 15 46 32.60 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 21/40 16 52 30.76 5 LOU BUSCH L 38/40 30 62 48.38 9 LLOYD MILTON W 43/24 18 46 39.13 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 159 444 35.81 9** LLOYD MILTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 VICTOR NOEL L 24/43 9 40 22.50 7 LARRY WESTMAN L 35/42 23 54 42.59 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 20/43 14 52 26.92 3 HORST HESSE L 31/40 21 54 38.88 5 LOU BUSCH W 40/23 23 60 38.33 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 4/41 7 34 20.58 10 MURRAY RAYNER W 43/31 23 52 44.23 6 DAVE ARNOLD L 16/40 14 38 36.84 8 LEN THOMPSON L 24/43 13 46 28.26 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 40%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 147 430 34.18 10 MURRAY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 HORST HESSE L 10/43 10 34 29.41 5 LOU BUSCH L 26/42 21 48 43.75 8 LEN THOMPSON W 42/30 24 52 46.15 2 ERNIE TRUDEL L 16/41 15 42 35.71 4 VICTOR NOEL L 24/42 17 50 34.00 7 LARRY WESTMAN L 28/41 18 48 37.50 9 LLOYD MILTON L 31/43 20 52 38.46 1 MIKE THOMPSON L 19/43 9 44 20.45 6 DAVE ARNOLD L 17/41 14 42 33.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 43%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 148 412 35.92 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 AL GUSHTA BC 1504 6 3 265 131 350 37.42% 2* LEWIS LAKE BC 4981 5 4 253 161 376 42.81% 3* LARRY HANER BC 1517 5 4 276 165 424 38.91% 4* AL REIFFER BC 0328 5 4 276 143 378 37.83% 5* OSCAR HOYSETH BC 3171 5 4 265 138 386 35.75% 6* BILL ROOS BC 4885 5 4 228 125 386 32.38% 7** HERB BOSCHMAN BC 2921 4 5 253 153 444 34.45% 8** STEW BATTIE BC 2886 4 5 234 119 408 29.16% 9***SAM TOMASEVIC BC 3454 3 6 229 131 396 33.08% 10***EARLE ANDERSON BC 1501 3 6 229 115 376 30.58% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 AL GUSHTA - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 OSCAR HOYSETH L 18/36 9 34 26.47 4 AL REIFFER W 37/24 21 46 45.65 8 STEW BATTIE W 36/24 18 54 33.33 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 35/14 18 48 37.50 9 SAM TOMASEVIC L 23/35 10 40 25.00 2 LEWIS LAKE W 35/6 15 24 62.50 6 BILL ROOS W 37/8 15 30 50.00 7 HERB BOSCHMAN L 9/37 8 34 23.52 3 LARRY HANER W 35/20 17 40 42.50 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 131 350 37.42 2* LEWIS LAKE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 STEW BATTIE L 19/35 19 44 43.18 6 BILL ROOS L 26/40 19 50 38.00 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 37/22 15 46 32.60 4 AL REIFFER W 36/13 22 42 52.38 5 OSCAR HOYSETH L 13/35 16 42 38.09 1 AL GUSHTA L 6/35 6 24 25.00 3 LARRY HANER W 37/25 27 50 54.00 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 39/26 16 38 42.10 7 HERB BOSCHMAN W 40/15 21 40 52.50 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 161 376 42.81 3* LARRY HANER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 EARLE ANDERSON L 17/36 15 48 31.25 5 OSCAR HOYSETH W 35/34 24 52 46.15 4 AL REIFFER W 39/23 17 44 38.63 8 STEW BATTIE W 35/22 22 52 42.30 7 HERB BOSCHMAN L 32/37 22 56 39.28 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 36/16 17 36 47.22 2 LEWIS LAKE L 25/37 21 50 42.00 6 BILL ROOS W 37/23 14 46 30.43 1 AL GUSHTA L 20/35 13 40 32.50 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 165 424 38.91 4* AL REIFFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 HERB BOSCHMAN W 40/21 22 50 44.00 1 AL GUSHTA L 24/37 18 46 39.13 3 LARRY HANER L 23/39 12 44 27.27 2 LEWIS LAKE L 13/36 12 42 28.57 6 BILL ROOS L 33/36 17 50 34.00 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 35/6 13 30 43.33 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 36/6 15 30 50.00 8 STEW BATTIE W 37/11 15 34 44.11 5 OSCAR HOYSETH W 35/14 19 52 36.53 (Was 38%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 143 378 37.83 5* OSCAR HOYSETH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 AL GUSHTA W 36/18 13 34 38.23 3 LARRY HANER L 34/35 22 52 42.30 7 HERB BOSCHMAN L 20/37 9 46 19.56 6 BILL ROOS W 35/7 15 36 41.66 2 LEWIS LAKE W 35/13 22 42 52.38 8 STEW BATTIE L 20/37 8 54 14.81 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 35/16 19 38 50.00 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 36/13 17 32 53.12 4 AL REIFFER L 14/35 13 52 25.00 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 138 386 35.75 6* BILL ROOS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 36/33 22 50 44.00 2 LEWIS LAKE W 40/26 23 50 46.00 10 EARLE ANDERSON L 6/37 5 34 14.70 5 OSCAR HOYSETH L 7/35 7 36 19.44 4 AL REIFFER W 36/33 19 50 38.00 7 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/19 20 48 41.66 1 AL GUSHTA L 8/37 6 30 20.00 3 LARRY HANER L 23/37 9 46 19.56 8 STEW BATTIE W 35/29 14 42 33.33 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 125 386 32.38 7** HERB BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 AL REIFFER L 21/40 17 50 34.00 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 35/32 16 54 29.62 5 OSCAR HOYSETH W 37/20 16 46 34.78 9 SAM TOMASEVIC L 22/37 20 60 33.33 3 LARRY HANER W 37/32 24 56 42.85 6 BILL ROOS L 19/37 12 48 25.00 8 STEW BATTIE L 30/37 18 56 32.14 1 AL GUSHTA W 37/9 18 34 52.94 2 LEWIS LAKE L 15/40 12 40 30.00 (Was 37%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 153 444 34.45 8** STEW BATTIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 LEWIS LAKE W 35/19 21 44 47.72 9 SAM TOMASEVIC W 35/32 16 44 36.36 1 AL GUSHTA L 24/36 14 54 25.92 3 LARRY HANER L 22/35 15 52 28.84 10 EARLE ANDERSON L 4/35 4 28 14.28 5 OSCAR HOYSETH W 37/20 13 54 24.07 7 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/30 18 56 32.14 4 AL REIFFER L 11/37 8 34 23.52 6 BILL ROOS L 29/35 10 42 23.80 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 119 408 29.16 9*** SAM TOMASEVIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BILL ROOS L 33/36 20 50 40.00 8 STEW BATTIE L 32/35 17 44 38.63 2 LEWIS LAKE L 22/37 10 46 21.73 7 HERB BOSCHMAN W 37/22 25 60 41.66 1 AL GUSHTA W 35/23 12 40 30.00 3 LARRY HANER L 16/36 11 36 30.55 4 AL REIFFER L 6/36 8 30 26.66 5 OSCAR HOYSETH L 13/36 9 32 28.12 10 EARLE ANDERSON W 35/27 19 58 32.75 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 131 396 33.08 10*** EARLE ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 LARRY HANER W 36/17 19 48 39.58 7 HERB BOSCHMAN L 32/35 15 54 27.77 6 BILL ROOS W 37/6 13 34 38.23 1 AL GUSHTA L 14/35 11 48 22.91 8 STEW BATTIE W 35/4 14 28 50.00 4 AL REIFFER L 6/35 4 30 13.33 5 OSCAR HOYSETH L 16/35 14 38 36.84 2 LEWIS LAKE L 26/39 9 38 23.68 9 SAM TOMASEVIC L 27/35 16 58 27.58 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 115 376 30.58 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# FRED GORDON BC 0663 8 2 357 163 440 37.04% 2 GARRY RAYNER BC 0740 7 3 329 163 474 34.38% 3* JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 6 3 258 128 388 32.98% 4* NEIL GROAT BC 3706 6 3 286 134 432 31.01% 5 DON MORGAN BC 0122 5 4 285 141 416 33.89% 6** FRED ORMISTON BC 3946 4 5 268 138 396 34.84% 7** RAY AMOS BC 2235 4 5 255 129 410 31.46% 8***DON HEYD BC 2910 2 7 214 104 368 28.26% 9***LOUIS LEVESQUE BC 2915 2 7 213 103 406 25.36% 10***ROY DAWE BC 2807 2 7 200 91 382 23.82% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# FRED GORDON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 DON HEYD W 38/11 13 32 40.62 4 NEIL GROAT W 35/25 18 46 39.13 5 DON MORGAN W 36/32 18 44 40.90 6 FRED ORMISTON W 37/21 20 46 43.47 7 RAY AMOS L 33/39 15 54 27.77 2 GARRY RAYNER W 35/16 18 38 47.36 10 ROY DAWE W 35/8 14 36 38.88 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 34/36 19 54 35.18 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 37/18 13 34 38.23 2 GARRY RAYNER W 37/34 15 56 26.78 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 163 440 37.04 2 GARRY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/3 12 32 37.50 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 28/36 17 52 32.69 10 ROY DAWE W 35/26 18 50 36.00 4 NEIL GROAT W 37/31 21 60 35.00 6 FRED ORMISTON W 37/28 18 46 39.13 1 FRED GORDON L 16/35 12 38 31.57 5 DON MORGAN W 35/22 18 58 31.03 8 DON HEYD W 35/14 14 38 36.84 7 RAY AMOS W 37/17 19 44 43.18 1 FRED GORDON L 34/37 14 56 25.00 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 163 474 34.38 3* JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 RAY AMOS W 38/30 16 50 32.00 2 GARRY RAYNER W 36/28 22 52 42.30 6 FRED ORMISTON L 13/37 10 42 23.80 8 DON HEYD W 35/28 14 42 33.33 5 DON MORGAN L 21/36 9 32 28.12 4 NEIL GROAT L 8/35 5 30 16.66 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 36/30 18 60 30.00 1 FRED GORDON W 36/34 21 54 38.88 10 ROY DAWE W 35/3 13 26 50.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 128 388 32.98 4* NEIL GROAT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DON MORGAN W 37/29 20 52 38.46 1 FRED GORDON L 25/35 14 46 30.43 7 RAY AMOS W 35/12 12 34 35.29 2 GARRY RAYNER L 31/37 20 60 33.33 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/28 13 56 23.21 3 JOE BRIETKOPF W 35/8 13 30 43.33 6 FRED ORMISTON L 17/37 11 50 22.00 10 ROY DAWE W 36/29 16 50 32.00 8 DON HEYD W 35/23 15 54 27.77 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 32%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 134 432 31.01 5 DON MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 NEIL GROAT L 29/37 19 52 36.53 8 DON HEYD W 35/28 18 44 40.90 1 FRED GORDON L 32/36 16 44 36.36 10 ROY DAWE W 36/20 17 38 44.73 3 JOE BRIETKOPF W 36/21 13 32 40.62 7 RAY AMOS L 25/35 12 52 23.07 2 GARRY RAYNER L 22/35 16 58 27.58 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/18 15 48 31.25 6 FRED ORMISTON W 35/25 15 48 31.25 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 141 416 33.89 6** FRED ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 ROY DAWE L 32/36 15 46 32.60 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 36/20 13 36 36.11 3 JOE BRIETKOPF W 37/13 17 42 40.47 1 FRED GORDON L 21/37 16 46 34.78 2 GARRY RAYNER L 28/37 16 46 34.78 8 DON HEYD W 36/14 17 38 44.73 4 NEIL GROAT W 37/17 16 50 32.00 7 RAY AMOS L 16/36 17 44 38.63 5 DON MORGAN L 25/35 11 48 22.91 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 138 396 34.84 7** RAY AMOS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 30/38 13 50 26.00 10 ROY DAWE L 29/35 16 44 36.36 4 NEIL GROAT L 12/35 6 34 17.64 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 22/38 9 48 18.75 1 FRED GORDON W 39/33 18 54 33.33 5 DON MORGAN W 35/25 15 52 28.84 8 DON HEYD W 35/26 15 40 37.50 6 FRED ORMISTON W 36/16 25 44 56.81 2 GARRY RAYNER L 17/37 12 44 27.27 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 33%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 129 410 31.46 8*** DON HEYD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 FRED GORDON L 11/38 5 32 15.62 5 DON MORGAN L 28/35 15 44 34.09 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE W 35/21 15 40 37.50 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 28/35 12 42 28.57 10 ROY DAWE W 35/16 12 40 30.00 6 FRED ORMISTON L 14/36 10 38 26.31 7 RAY AMOS L 26/35 14 40 35.00 2 GARRY RAYNER L 14/35 8 38 21.05 4 NEIL GROAT L 23/35 13 54 24.07 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 32%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 104 368 28.26 9*** LOUIS LEVESQUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GARRY RAYNER L 3/35 5 32 15.62 6 FRED ORMISTON L 20/36 10 36 27.77 8 DON HEYD L 21/35 12 40 30.00 7 RAY AMOS W 38/22 15 48 31.25 4 NEIL GROAT L 28/35 11 56 19.64 10 ROY DAWE W 37/27 13 52 25.00 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 30/36 17 60 28.33 5 DON MORGAN L 18/35 10 48 20.83 1 FRED GORDON L 18/37 10 34 29.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 103 406 25.36 10*** ROY DAWE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 FRED ORMISTON W 36/32 16 46 34.78 7 RAY AMOS W 35/29 16 44 36.36 2 GARRY RAYNER L 26/35 15 50 30.00 5 DON MORGAN L 20/36 11 38 28.94 8 DON HEYD L 16/35 7 40 17.50 9 LOUIS LEVESQUE L 27/37 5 52 9.61 1 FRED GORDON L 8/35 6 36 16.66 4 NEIL GROAT L 29/36 13 50 26.00 3 JOE BRIETKOPF L 3/35 2 26 7.69 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 91 382 23.82 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS E (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ANDREW WEPRUK BC 2240 8 2 341 132 458 28.82% 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT BC 0313 7 3 320 128 462 27.70% 3* DAVE STICKLE BC 0656 6 3 294 126 390 32.30% 4* TED MICHALSKI BC 0177 6 3 286 114 392 29.08% 5** JOHN BARRETT BC 0803 5 4 282 115 414 27.77% 6** ROBIN DEGRAAF BC 0061 5 4 250 101 454 22.24% 7 BUSTER BUCKLE BC 3700 4 5 265 99 424 23.34% 8 NORM LEBRUN BC 2815 3 6 248 97 444 21.84% 9 BEN MEYER BC 2237 2 7 175 69 366 18.85% 10 SCOTT O`NEIL BC 0362 0 9 182 78 420 18.57% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ANDREW WEPRUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 21/35 10 36 27.77 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 34/36 10 58 17.24 3 DAVE STICKLE W 35/32 18 58 31.03 5 JOHN BARRETT W 35/32 13 56 23.21 9 BEN MEYER W 36/18 11 40 27.50 4 TED MICHALSKI W 36/18 13 36 36.11 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 36/17 12 42 28.57 8 NORM LEBRUN W 37/25 13 42 30.95 7 BUSTER BUCKLE W 35/19 15 48 31.25 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT W 36/21 17 42 40.47 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 132 458 28.82 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ANDREW WEPRUK W 35/21 11 36 30.55 7 BUSTER BUCKLE W 35/18 17 46 36.95 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 37/21 11 50 22.00 4 TED MICHALSKI W 35/30 13 50 26.00 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 36/10 13 32 40.62 8 NORM LEBRUN W 38/31 15 70 21.42 9 BEN MEYER W 35/4 11 28 39.28 5 JOHN BARRETT L 19/35 11 48 22.91 3 DAVE STICKLE L 29/35 14 60 23.33 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 21/36 12 42 28.57 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 128 462 27.70 3* DAVE STICKLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 NORM LEBRUN L 27/39 11 50 22.00 4 TED MICHALSKI W 38/24 18 36 50.00 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 32/35 18 58 31.03 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 35/15 11 36 30.55 7 BUSTER BUCKLE W 37/21 14 50 28.00 9 BEN MEYER W 36/3 12 24 50.00 5 JOHN BARRETT L 18/37 7 42 16.66 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 36/18 17 34 50.00 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT W 35/29 18 60 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 30%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 126 390 32.30 4* TED MICHALSKI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 BEN MEYER W 35/6 15 28 53.57 3 DAVE STICKLE L 24/38 13 36 36.11 5 JOHN BARRETT W 37/31 15 42 35.71 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 30/35 13 50 26.00 8 NORM LEBRUN W 35/25 15 50 30.00 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 18/36 8 36 22.22 7 BUSTER BUCKLE W 35/32 10 58 17.24 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 35/30 10 50 20.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 37/15 15 42 35.71 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 114 392 29.08 5** JOHN BARRETT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 39/22 17 48 35.41 8 NORM LEBRUN L 18/39 7 46 15.21 4 TED MICHALSKI L 31/37 12 42 28.57 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 32/35 14 56 25.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF W 35/16 12 42 28.57 7 BUSTER BUCKLE L 18/35 11 34 32.35 3 DAVE STICKLE W 37/18 13 42 30.95 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT W 35/19 16 48 33.33 9 BEN MEYER W 37/25 13 56 23.21 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 30%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 115 414 27.77 6** ROBIN DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 BUSTER BUCKLE W 35/33 12 50 24.00 1 ANDREW WEPRUK W 36/34 14 58 24.13 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 21/37 9 50 18.00 9 BEN MEYER W 35/22 12 58 20.68 5 JOHN BARRETT L 16/35 7 42 16.66 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 37/34 12 76 15.78 8 NORM LEBRUN W 37/25 14 44 31.81 3 DAVE STICKLE L 18/36 11 34 32.35 4 TED MICHALSKI L 15/37 10 42 23.80 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 101 454 22.24 7 BUSTER BUCKLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 33/35 10 50 20.00 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 18/35 11 46 23.91 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 37/8 10 40 25.00 8 NORM LEBRUN W 35/19 10 44 22.72 3 DAVE STICKLE L 21/37 8 50 16.00 5 JOHN BARRETT W 35/18 14 34 41.17 4 TED MICHALSKI L 32/35 12 58 20.68 9 BEN MEYER W 35/25 15 54 27.77 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 19/35 9 48 18.75 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 99 424 23.34 8 NORM LEBRUN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DAVE STICKLE W 39/27 14 50 28.00 5 JOHN BARRETT W 39/18 14 46 30.43 9 BEN MEYER L 8/37 5 40 12.50 7 BUSTER BUCKLE L 19/35 6 44 13.63 4 TED MICHALSKI L 25/35 13 50 26.00 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 31/38 12 70 17.14 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 25/37 9 44 20.45 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 25/37 11 42 26.19 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 37/32 13 58 22.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 28%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 97 444 21.84 9 BEN MEYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 TED MICHALSKI L 6/35 5 28 17.85 10 SCOTT O`NEIL W 35/14 15 38 39.47 8 NORM LEBRUN W 37/8 12 40 30.00 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 22/35 6 58 10.34 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 18/36 7 40 17.50 3 DAVE STICKLE L 3/36 2 24 8.33 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 4/35 0 28 0.00 7 BUSTER BUCKLE L 25/35 12 54 22.22 5 JOHN BARRETT L 25/37 10 56 17.85 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 29%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 69 366 18.85 10 SCOTT O`NEIL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOHN BARRETT L 22/39 11 48 22.91 9 BEN MEYER L 14/35 11 38 28.94 7 BUSTER BUCKLE L 8/37 3 40 7.50 3 DAVE STICKLE L 15/35 5 36 13.88 2 BOB HILDEBRANDT L 10/36 5 32 15.62 6 ROBIN DEGRAAF L 34/37 10 76 13.15 1 ANDREW WEPRUK L 17/36 8 42 19.04 4 TED MICHALSKI L 30/35 10 50 20.00 8 NORM LEBRUN L 32/37 15 58 25.86 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 27%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 78 420 18.57 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS F (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# TOM HARRIS BC 0525 9 1 292 93 378 24.60% 2 DICK HOPKINS BC 3159 8 2 283 94 422 22.27% 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON BC 6 3 259 73 354 20.62% 4 WALTER KUTZNER BC 3970 5 4 228 74 354 20.90% 5* JACK SPARKS BC 0705 4 5 201 81 350 23.14% 6* MICHAEL MILLER BC 0355 4 5 224 80 370 21.62% 7* DAN COFFIN BC 3287 4 5 209 70 378 18.51% 8 BOB FEDORUK BC 0289 3 6 208 71 336 21.13% 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON BC 3994 2 7 183 55 408 13.48% 10 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 1 8 175 76 374 20.32% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 MICHAEL MILLER W 30/10 11 34 32.35 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 30/8 12 34 35.29 5 JACK SPARKS W 30/28 9 46 19.56 8 BOB FEDORUK W 30/15 10 30 33.33 7 DAN COFFIN W 30/6 5 36 13.88 10 VINCE HERKEL W 30/28 11 50 22.00 2 DICK HOPKINS L 21/30 8 38 21.05 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 30/15 6 42 14.28 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON W 30/27 11 38 28.94 2 DICK HOPKINS W 31/9 10 30 33.33 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 93 378 24.60 2 DICK HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 BOB FEDORUK W 32/20 10 48 20.83 6 MICHAEL MILLER W 30/11 10 34 29.41 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 31/26 11 44 25.00 5 JACK SPARKS W 30/26 12 46 26.08 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 29/32 11 54 20.37 7 DAN COFFIN W 30/18 12 40 30.00 1 TOM HARRIS W 30/21 9 38 23.68 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON W 30/23 9 38 23.68 10 VINCE HERKEL W 32/15 7 50 14.00 1 TOM HARRIS L 9/31 3 30 10.00 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 94 422 22.27 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JACK SPARKS W 30/15 7 32 21.87 7 DAN COFFIN W 32/14 10 34 29.41 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 31/23 9 52 17.30 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 20/30 6 42 14.28 8 BOB FEDORUK W 31/16 7 38 18.42 6 MICHAEL MILLER W 32/21 10 44 22.72 10 VINCE HERKEL W 33/4 10 36 27.77 2 DICK HOPKINS L 23/30 5 38 13.15 1 TOM HARRIS L 27/30 9 38 23.68 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 25%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 73 354 20.62 4 WALTER KUTZNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 VINCE HERKEL L 24/30 7 38 18.42 1 TOM HARRIS L 8/30 5 34 14.70 2 DICK HOPKINS L 26/31 10 44 22.72 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON W 30/20 10 42 23.80 6 MICHAEL MILLER L 15/30 5 44 11.36 5 JACK SPARKS W 30/4 6 32 18.75 7 DAN COFFIN W 32/26 12 50 24.00 8 BOB FEDORUK W 32/13 10 36 27.77 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 31/8 9 34 26.47 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 22%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 74 354 20.90 5* JACK SPARKS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 15/30 6 32 18.75 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 30/21 12 46 26.08 1 TOM HARRIS L 28/30 11 46 23.91 2 DICK HOPKINS L 26/30 12 46 26.08 10 VINCE HERKEL W 30/10 11 38 28.94 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 4/30 1 32 3.12 8 BOB FEDORUK L 4/31 4 36 11.11 6 MICHAEL MILLER W 33/25 13 44 29.54 7 DAN COFFIN W 31/18 11 30 36.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 21%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 81 350 23.14 6* MICHAEL MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 TOM HARRIS L 10/30 6 34 17.64 2 DICK HOPKINS L 11/30 4 34 11.76 10 VINCE HERKEL W 35/25 10 38 26.31 7 DAN COFFIN L 26/32 11 54 20.37 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 30/15 13 44 29.54 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 21/32 7 44 15.90 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 32/17 10 44 22.72 5 JACK SPARKS L 25/33 9 44 20.45 8 BOB FEDORUK W 34/20 10 34 29.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 24%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 80 370 21.62 7* DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 32/22 8 54 14.81 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 14/32 5 34 14.70 8 BOB FEDORUK W 30/27 11 36 30.55 6 MICHAEL MILLER W 32/26 11 54 20.37 1 TOM HARRIS L 6/30 2 36 5.55 2 DICK HOPKINS L 18/30 7 40 17.50 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 26/32 8 50 16.00 10 VINCE HERKEL W 33/24 13 44 29.54 5 JACK SPARKS L 18/31 5 30 16.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 22%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 70 378 18.51 8 BOB FEDORUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DICK HOPKINS L 20/32 7 48 14.58 10 VINCE HERKEL W 35/21 11 38 28.94 7 DAN COFFIN L 27/30 10 36 27.77 1 TOM HARRIS L 15/30 7 30 23.33 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 16/31 5 38 13.15 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 31/13 10 40 25.00 5 JACK SPARKS W 31/4 10 36 27.77 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 13/32 6 36 16.66 6 MICHAEL MILLER L 20/34 5 34 14.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 23%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 71 336 21.13 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 DAN COFFIN L 22/32 5 54 9.25 5 JACK SPARKS L 21/30 8 46 17.39 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 23/31 8 52 15.38 10 VINCE HERKEL W 32/18 9 42 21.42 2 DICK HOPKINS W 32/29 10 54 18.51 8 BOB FEDORUK L 13/31 2 40 5.00 6 MICHAEL MILLER L 17/32 4 44 9.09 1 TOM HARRIS L 15/30 5 42 11.90 4 WALTER KUTZNER L 8/31 4 34 11.76 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 22%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 55 408 13.48 10 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 WALTER KUTZNER W 30/24 10 38 26.31 8 BOB FEDORUK L 21/35 8 38 21.05 6 MICHAEL MILLER L 25/35 8 38 21.05 9 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 18/32 7 42 16.66 5 JACK SPARKS L 10/30 7 38 18.42 1 TOM HARRIS L 28/30 15 50 30.00 3 MICHAEL THOMPSON L 4/33 4 36 11.11 7 DAN COFFIN L 24/33 11 44 25.00 2 DICK HOPKINS L 15/32 6 50 12.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 24%) TOTALS W 1 L 8 76 374 20.32 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS G (25 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 JIM GALLANT BC 0169 8 2 247 81 366 22.13% 2* GERRY CUTHBERT BC 3910 7 3 234 75 356 21.06% 3* DALE DONAHUE BC 2232 7 3 239 79 388 20.36% 4** BRUCE ALDRIDGE BC 3632 4 6 189 73 368 19.83% 5** NICK CULIC BC 3486 4 6 198 56 380 14.73% 6 FRED VIENNEAU BC 2941 0 10 137 53 382 13.87% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 JIM GALLANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 25/11 7 34 20.58 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 26/11 6 32 18.75 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 20/25 5 34 14.70 5 NICK CULIC W 27/16 8 32 25.00 3 DALE DONAHUE W 27/19 8 40 20.00 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 27/15 9 38 23.68 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE L 16/25 7 38 18.42 2 GERRY CUTHBERT W 28/19 11 34 32.35 5 NICK CULIC W 25/21 9 48 18.75 3 DALE DONAHUE W 26/18 11 36 30.55 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 81 366 22.13 2* GERRY CUTHBERT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DALE DONAHUE L 11/27 4 28 14.28 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 25/19 11 42 26.19 1 JIM GALLANT W 25/20 7 34 20.58 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 25/16 10 40 25.00 5 NICK CULIC W 26/10 8 30 26.66 3 DALE DONAHUE L 21/25 5 34 14.70 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 27/10 8 32 25.00 1 JIM GALLANT L 19/28 6 34 17.64 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 27/23 8 34 23.52 5 NICK CULIC W 28/15 8 48 16.66 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 75 356 21.06 3* DALE DONAHUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GERRY CUTHBERT W 27/11 10 28 35.71 5 NICK CULIC W 25/18 9 48 18.75 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 25/8 9 24 37.50 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 26/18 5 54 9.25 1 JIM GALLANT L 19/27 8 40 20.00 2 GERRY CUTHBERT W 25/21 9 34 26.47 5 NICK CULIC L 21/25 6 38 15.78 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 25/19 9 44 20.45 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 28/15 7 42 16.66 1 JIM GALLANT L 18/26 7 36 19.44 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 79 388 20.36 4** BRUCE ALDRIDGE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 NICK CULIC W 25/17 9 44 20.45 1 JIM GALLANT L 11/26 5 32 15.62 3 DALE DONAHUE L 8/25 4 24 16.66 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 16/25 7 40 17.50 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 26/23 8 44 18.18 5 NICK CULIC L 11/26 4 32 12.50 1 JIM GALLANT W 25/16 10 38 26.31 3 DALE DONAHUE L 19/25 8 44 18.18 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 23/27 9 34 26.47 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 25/11 9 36 25.00 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 73 368 19.83 5** NICK CULIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE L 17/25 6 44 13.63 3 DALE DONAHUE L 18/25 5 48 10.41 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 25/1 4 26 15.38 1 JIM GALLANT L 16/27 4 32 12.50 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 10/26 3 30 10.00 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE W 26/11 8 32 25.00 3 DALE DONAHUE W 25/21 9 38 23.68 6 FRED VIENNEAU W 25/14 7 34 20.58 1 JIM GALLANT L 21/25 5 48 10.41 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 15/28 5 48 10.41 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 56 380 14.73 6 FRED VIENNEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 JIM GALLANT L 11/25 5 34 14.70 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 19/25 10 42 23.80 5 NICK CULIC L 1/25 1 26 3.84 3 DALE DONAHUE L 18/26 4 54 7.40 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE L 23/26 6 44 13.63 1 JIM GALLANT L 15/27 7 38 18.42 2 GERRY CUTHBERT L 10/27 5 32 15.62 5 NICK CULIC L 14/25 5 34 14.70 3 DALE DONAHUE L 15/28 5 42 11.90 4 BRUCE ALDRIDGE L 11/25 5 36 13.88 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 0 L 10 53 382 13.87 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 MEN - CLASS H (25Pts/50Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SYD ANDERSON BC 0401 8 2 243 60 382 15.70% 2* CLOVIS TOUSIGNANT BC 0508 6 4 205 64 414 15.45% 3* GORDON SKREPNEK BC 0529 6 4 210 51 414 12.31% 4** IRVINE THORPE BC 0527 4 6 163 37 358 10.33% 5** GEORGE GILES BC 1013 4 6 174 33 422 7.81% 6 RALPH MELTON BC 0526 2 8 139 26 422 6.16% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SYD ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 GEORGE GILES W 25/11 5 46 10.86 6 RALPH MELTON W 25/5 5 28 17.85 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 25/10 4 44 9.09 3 GORDON SKREPNEK W 24/19 4 54 7.40 4 IRVINE THORPE W 25/6 7 22 31.81 5 GEORGE GILES W 26/15 6 36 16.66 6 RALPH MELTON W 28/11 8 32 25.00 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 19/27 8 42 19.04 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 20/25 8 46 17.39 4 IRVINE THORPE W 26/9 5 32 15.62 (Was 16%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 60 382 15.70 2* CLOVIS TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 RALPH MELTON L 14/25 5 44 11.36 4 IRVINE THORPE W 27/10 9 30 30.00 1 SYD ANDERSON L 10/25 4 44 9.09 5 GEORGE GILES W 25/9 6 42 14.28 3 GORDON SKREPNEK W 25/12 5 38 13.15 6 RALPH MELTON W 23/17 7 50 14.00 4 IRVINE THORPE L 16/20 4 50 8.00 1 SYD ANDERSON W 27/19 12 42 28.57 5 GEORGE GILES L 10/28 5 32 15.62 3 GORDON SKREPNEK W 28/12 7 42 16.66 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 64 414 15.45 3* GORDON SKREPNEK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 IRVINE THORPE W 26/22 5 40 12.50 5 GEORGE GILES L 13/24 2 50 4.00 6 RALPH MELTON W 25/16 6 48 12.50 1 SYD ANDERSON L 19/24 6 54 11.11 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 12/25 2 38 5.26 4 IRVINE THORPE W 26/7 7 26 26.92 5 GEORGE GILES W 25/11 4 38 10.52 6 RALPH MELTON W 27/7 6 32 18.75 1 SYD ANDERSON W 25/20 10 46 21.73 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 12/28 3 42 7.14 (Was 10%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 51 414 12.31 4** IRVINE THORPE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 22/26 6 40 15.00 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 10/27 2 30 6.66 5 GEORGE GILES L 11/27 1 44 2.27 6 RALPH MELTON W 26/16 6 48 12.50 1 SYD ANDERSON L 6/25 2 22 9.09 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 7/26 3 26 11.53 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 20/16 3 50 6.00 5 GEORGE GILES W 25/4 5 30 16.66 6 RALPH MELTON W 27/6 6 36 16.66 1 SYD ANDERSON L 9/26 3 32 9.37 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 37 358 10.33 5** GEORGE GILES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SYD ANDERSON L 11/25 2 46 4.34 3 GORDON SKREPNEK W 24/13 3 50 6.00 4 IRVINE THORPE W 27/11 3 44 6.81 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 9/25 1 42 2.38 6 RALPH MELTON W 26/15 5 50 10.00 1 SYD ANDERSON L 15/26 4 36 11.11 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 11/25 2 38 5.26 4 IRVINE THORPE L 4/25 1 30 3.33 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 28/10 9 32 28.12 6 RALPH MELTON L 19/21 3 54 5.55 (Was 8%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 33 422 7.81 6 RALPH MELTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 25/14 6 44 13.63 1 SYD ANDERSON L 5/25 2 28 7.14 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 16/25 3 48 6.25 4 IRVINE THORPE L 16/26 3 48 6.25 5 GEORGE GILES L 15/26 3 50 6.00 2 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 17/23 4 50 8.00 1 SYD ANDERSON L 11/28 2 32 6.25 3 GORDON SKREPNEK L 7/27 0 32 0.00 4 IRVINE THORPE L 6/27 1 36 2.77 5 GEORGE GILES W 21/19 2 54 3.70 (Was 8%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 26 422 6.16 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BERNICE BUSCH BC 4858 11 1 496 366 522 70.11% 2* ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 8 4 452 380 640 59.37% 3* DARLENE HILDEBRANDT BC 0314 8 4 412 307 536 57.27% 4 CAROL ORMISTON BC 3903 7 5 363 304 542 56.08% 5 BRENDA ARNOLD BC 3894 5 7 323 246 510 48.23% 6 RUBY MILLER BC 4853 2 10 301 260 554 46.93% 7 SUSAN HILDEBRANDT BC 1 11 240 201 504 39.88% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BERNICE BUSCH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 41/13 23 32 71.87 6 RUBY MILLER W 42/27 39 62 62.90 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT W 42/3 21 28 75.00 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 41/5 24 34 70.58 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/34 39 58 67.24 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 44/19 28 44 63.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 40/12 24 34 70.58 6 RUBY MILLER W 41/23 35 54 64.81 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT W 42/19 41 56 73.21 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 40/3 25 30 83.33 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 45/10 30 36 83.33 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 38/40 37 54 68.51 (Was 70%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 366 522 70.11 2* ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BRENDA ARNOLD L 37/40 31 56 55.35 6 RUBY MILLER W 43/16 25 44 56.81 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT W 43/26 29 48 60.41 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 22/42 30 56 53.57 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 40/26 20 38 52.63 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 19/44 21 44 47.72 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/26 29 48 60.41 6 RUBY MILLER W 42/31 38 62 61.29 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT W 42/37 35 58 60.34 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 39/40 57 86 66.27 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 43/13 27 46 58.69 1 BERNICE BUSCH W 40/38 38 54 70.37 (Was 61%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 380 640 59.37 3* DARLENE HILDEBRANDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 40/14 17 30 56.66 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 42/19 26 38 68.42 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 26/43 24 48 50.00 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 3/42 10 28 35.71 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 43/24 30 54 55.55 6 RUBY MILLER W 40/28 30 52 57.69 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 40/26 27 54 50.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/4 23 32 71.87 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 37/42 33 58 56.89 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 19/42 35 56 62.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/24 24 44 54.54 6 RUBY MILLER W 40/14 28 42 66.66 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 307 536 57.27 4 CAROL ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 RUBY MILLER W 41/9 23 36 63.88 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 19/42 18 38 47.36 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD L 7/40 18 38 47.36 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 42/22 36 56 64.28 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 34/40 37 58 63.79 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 43/15 23 40 57.50 6 RUBY MILLER W 40/18 14 32 43.75 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 4/40 11 32 34.37 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 40/17 28 44 63.63 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/39 57 86 66.27 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 10/45 18 36 50.00 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 43/31 21 46 45.65 (Was 59%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 304 542 56.08 5 BRENDA ARNOLD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE W 40/37 32 56 57.14 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 13/41 14 32 43.75 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 41/13 22 40 55.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/7 27 38 71.05 6 RUBY MILLER W 40/25 25 42 59.52 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 24/43 24 54 44.44 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 26/42 23 48 47.91 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 12/40 14 34 41.17 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 41/26 22 48 45.83 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 17/40 19 44 43.18 6 RUBY MILLER L 5/42 7 30 23.33 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 24/42 17 44 38.63 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 52%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 246 510 48.23 6 RUBY MILLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 9/41 11 36 30.55 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 16/43 16 44 36.36 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 27/42 32 62 51.61 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT W 40/24 25 44 56.81 5 BRENDA ARNOLD L 25/40 20 42 47.61 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 28/40 26 52 50.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 18/40 7 32 21.87 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 31/42 34 62 54.83 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 23/41 29 54 53.70 7 SUSA HILDEBRANDT L 28/44 21 54 38.88 5 BRENDA ARNOLD W 42/5 19 30 63.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 14/40 20 42 47.61 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 260 554 46.93 7 SUSAN HILDEBRANDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 14/40 9 30 30.00 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD L 13/41 14 40 35.00 6 RUBY MILLER L 24/40 21 44 47.72 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 5/41 12 34 35.29 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 26/40 15 38 39.47 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 15/43 15 40 37.50 3 DARL HILDEBRANDT L 26/40 21 54 38.88 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- 5 BRENDA ARNOLD L 26/41 19 48 39.58 6 RUBY MILLER W 44/28 27 54 50.00 1 BERNICE BUSCH L 3/40 13 30 43.33 2 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 13/43 17 46 36.95 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 31/43 18 46 39.13 (Was 55%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 201 504 39.88 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 9 1 409 236 500 47.20% 2 BONNIE HERRETT BC 0242 8 2 389 222 458 48.47% 3* DOROTHY BUTTS BC 4201 5 4 341 206 466 44.20% 4* IDA BOSCHMAN BC 2923 5 4 293 177 432 40.97% 5* BETTY REYKLIN BC 0368 5 4 280 175 432 40.50% 6** SHARON ATKINSON BC 0232 4 5 319 206 430 47.90% 7** ELAINE STERN BC 2936 4 5 287 193 424 45.51% 8***ANNIE RAYNER BC 0739 2 7 247 161 434 37.09% 9***DOROTHY KRIMMER BC 3902 2 7 289 173 478 36.19% 10***ELAINE RUSH BC 3881 2 7 182 120 374 32.08% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 36/40 18 50 36.00 2 BONNIE HERRETT W 40/36 25 58 43.10 5 BETTY REYKLIN W 42/8 19 32 59.37 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/32 22 62 35.48 10 ELAINE RUSH W 40/7 14 28 50.00 3 DOROTHY BUTTS W 42/32 32 68 47.05 7 ELAINE STERN W 43/27 21 40 52.50 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/30 33 56 58.92 6 SHARON ATKINSON W 43/22 28 58 48.27 2 BONNIE HERRETT W 40/26 24 48 50.00 (Was 48%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 236 500 47.20 2 BONNIE HERRETT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DOROTHY BUTTS W 42/27 31 56 55.35 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 36/40 26 58 44.82 7 ELAINE STERN W 41/9 21 34 61.76 6 SHARON ATKINSON W 40/28 23 52 44.23 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/16 16 36 44.44 5 BETTY REYKLIN W 42/30 25 52 48.07 10 ELAINE RUSH W 42/13 20 36 55.55 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 40/39 20 46 43.47 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/23 20 40 50.00 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 26/40 20 48 41.66 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 222 458 48.47 3* DOROTHY BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 27/42 25 56 44.64 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 42/16 20 46 43.47 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 37/40 19 50 38.00 8 ANNIE RAYNER L 39/40 26 60 43.33 5 BETTY REYKLIN W 43/21 21 38 55.26 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 32/42 29 68 42.64 6 SHARON ATKINSON W 41/31 23 46 50.00 10 ELAINE RUSH W 40/13 18 40 45.00 7 ELAINE STERN W 40/34 25 62 40.32 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 47%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 206 466 44.20 4* IDA BOSCHMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/36 20 50 40.00 7 ELAINE STERN W 42/35 31 66 46.96 3 DOROTHY BUTTS W 40/37 19 50 38.00 10 ELAINE RUSH W 42/17 20 42 47.61 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 16/40 8 36 22.22 6 SHARON ATKINSON L 9/44 16 42 38.09 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/9 17 34 50.00 5 BETTY REYKLIN L 31/40 25 54 46.29 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 33/40 21 58 36.20 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 47%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 177 432 40.97 5* BETTY REYKLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SHARON ATKINSON W 41/39 27 62 43.54 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/25 16 34 47.05 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 8/42 8 32 25.00 7 ELAINE STERN L 19/41 14 50 28.00 3 DOROTHY BUTTS L 21/43 14 38 36.84 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 30/42 21 52 40.38 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/28 24 50 48.00 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/31 26 54 48.14 10 ELAINE RUSH W 40/27 25 60 41.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 43%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 175 432 40.50 6** SHARON ATKINSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BETTY REYKLIN L 39/41 27 62 43.54 10 ELAINE RUSH W 40/10 17 28 60.71 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 41/23 26 52 50.00 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 28/40 21 52 40.38 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER L 34/45 21 54 38.88 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 44/9 28 42 66.66 3 DOROTHY BUTTS L 31/41 19 46 41.30 7 ELAINE STERN W 40/16 24 36 66.66 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 22/43 23 58 39.65 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 49%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 206 430 47.90 7** ELAINE STERN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 42/29 29 54 53.70 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 35/42 31 66 46.96 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 9/41 11 34 32.35 5 BETTY REYKLIN W 41/19 24 50 48.00 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/28 20 50 40.00 10 ELAINE RUSH W 41/12 20 32 62.50 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 27/43 18 40 45.00 6 SHARON ATKINSON L 16/40 16 36 44.44 3 DOROTHY BUTTS L 34/40 24 62 38.70 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 48%) TOTALS W 4 L 5 193 424 45.51 8*** ANNIE RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 ELAINE RUSH L 26/42 19 54 35.18 5 BETTY REYKLIN L 25/40 12 34 35.29 6 SHARON ATKINSON L 23/41 19 52 36.53 3 DOROTHY BUTTS W 40/39 23 60 38.33 7 ELAINE STERN L 28/42 16 50 32.00 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 43/25 23 54 42.59 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 9/40 5 34 14.70 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 30/42 29 56 51.78 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 23/40 15 40 37.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 161 434 37.09 9*** DOROTHY KRIMMER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 ELAINE STERN L 29/42 24 54 44.44 3 DOROTHY BUTTS L 16/42 11 46 23.91 10 ELAINE RUSH L 35/41 19 54 35.18 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 32/41 20 62 32.25 6 SHARON ATKINSON W 45/34 22 54 40.74 8 ANNIE RAYNER L 25/43 17 54 31.48 5 BETTY REYKLIN L 28/41 19 50 38.00 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 39/40 20 46 43.47 4 IDA BOSCHMAN W 40/33 21 58 36.20 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 45%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 173 478 36.19 10*** ELAINE RUSH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/26 22 54 40.74 6 SHARON ATKINSON L 10/40 6 28 21.42 9 DOROTHY KRIMMER W 41/35 21 54 38.88 4 IDA BOSCHMAN L 17/42 13 42 30.95 1 VERNA WEINGARDT L 7/40 4 28 14.28 7 ELAINE STERN L 12/41 10 32 31.25 2 BONNIE HERRETT L 13/42 10 36 27.77 3 DOROTHY BUTTS L 13/40 11 40 27.50 5 BETTY REYKLIN L 27/40 23 60 38.33 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 120 374 32.08 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# VERA WHITNACK BC 3335 9 1 311 166 334 49.70% 2 DAWN WARWICK BC 0639 8 2 285 158 384 41.14% 3 YVONNE GREAVES BC 9767 6 3 253 153 372 41.12% 4* NORENE BATTIE BC 2884 5 4 226 116 324 35.80% 5* BARB KERR BC 0174 5 4 228 124 378 32.80% 6* SHARON FRASER BC 0151 5 4 229 116 358 32.40% 7** MARIE LALONDE BC 0386 3 6 187 96 350 27.42% 8** SIMONE SCHNEIDER BC 3145 3 6 169 83 320 25.93% 9 GERDA RUS BC 0402 2 7 200 115 352 32.67% 10 WANDA OERLEMANS BC 0215 0 9 0 0 0 0.00% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# VERA WHITNACK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SHARON FRASER L 24/36 18 52 34.61 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 35/23 18 44 40.90 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 7 MARIE LALONDE W 35/3 16 24 66.66 9 GERDA RUS W 36/16 20 36 55.55 5 BARB KERR W 35/12 18 40 45.00 3 YVONNE GREAVES W 36/24 20 40 50.00 2 DAWN WARWICK W 37/13 18 30 60.00 4 NORENE BATTIE W 35/3 19 30 63.33 2 DAWN WARWICK W 37/16 19 38 50.00 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 166 334 49.70 2 DAWN WARWICK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 9 GERDA RUS W 35/30 20 50 40.00 5 BARB KERR W 37/14 20 36 55.55 7 MARIE LALONDE W 39/32 20 56 35.71 6 SHARON FRASER W 36/23 26 60 43.33 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 35/4 12 26 46.15 4 NORENE BATTIE W 37/26 19 48 39.58 1 VERA WHITNACK L 13/37 10 30 33.33 3 YVONNE GREAVES W 36/15 20 40 50.00 1 VERA WHITNACK L 16/37 11 38 28.94 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 158 384 41.14 3 YVONNE GREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 MARIE LALONDE W 38/6 16 26 61.53 9 GERDA RUS W 37/25 22 46 47.82 5 BARB KERR W 35/25 26 58 44.82 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 6 SHARON FRASER W 36/29 18 50 36.00 4 NORENE BATTIE L 32/35 23 58 39.65 1 VERA WHITNACK L 24/36 16 40 40.00 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 35/23 19 54 35.18 2 DAWN WARWICK L 15/36 13 40 32.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 39%) TOTALS W 6 L 3 153 372 41.12 4* NORENE BATTIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BARB KERR L 29/36 11 44 25.00 7 MARIE LALONDE L 24/36 13 48 27.08 6 SHARON FRASER W 35/7 14 28 50.00 9 GERDA RUS W 37/19 18 38 47.36 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 36/7 17 30 56.66 3 YVONNE GREAVES W 35/32 21 58 36.20 2 DAWN WARWICK L 26/37 14 48 29.16 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 1 VERA WHITNACK L 3/35 8 30 26.66 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 42%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 116 324 35.80 5* BARB KERR - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 NORENE BATTIE W 36/29 12 44 27.27 2 DAWN WARWICK L 14/37 12 36 33.33 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 25/35 23 58 39.65 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 37/29 14 42 33.33 7 MARIE LALONDE L 32/35 16 54 29.62 1 VERA WHITNACK L 12/35 9 40 22.50 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 6 SHARON FRASER W 36/27 17 52 32.69 9 GERDA RUS W 35/31 21 52 40.38 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 39%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 124 378 32.80 6* SHARON FRASER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VERA WHITNACK W 36/24 20 52 38.46 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 4 NORENE BATTIE L 7/35 5 28 17.85 2 DAWN WARWICK L 23/36 21 60 35.00 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 29/36 16 50 32.00 7 MARIE LALONDE W 35/28 15 54 27.77 9 GERDA RUS W 35/13 12 30 40.00 5 BARB KERR L 27/36 14 52 26.92 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER W 36/10 13 32 40.62 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 34%) TOTALS W 5 L 4 116 358 32.40 7** MARIE LALONDE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 6/38 6 26 23.07 4 NORENE BATTIE W 36/24 16 48 33.33 2 DAWN WARWICK L 32/39 17 56 30.35 1 VERA WHITNACK L 3/35 5 24 20.83 5 BARB KERR W 35/32 14 54 25.92 6 SHARON FRASER L 28/35 14 54 25.92 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER L 23/37 8 40 20.00 9 GERDA RUS L 23/35 16 48 33.33 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 96 350 27.42 8** SIMONE SCHNEIDER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 1 VERA WHITNACK L 23/35 14 44 31.81 9 GERDA RUS W 35/30 12 52 23.07 5 BARB KERR L 29/37 11 42 26.19 4 NORENE BATTIE L 7/36 7 30 23.33 2 DAWN WARWICK L 4/35 3 26 11.53 7 MARIE LALONDE W 37/23 15 40 37.50 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 23/35 17 54 31.48 6 SHARON FRASER L 10/36 4 32 12.50 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 35%) TOTALS W 3 L 6 83 320 25.93 9 GERDA RUS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DAWN WARWICK L 30/35 16 50 32.00 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 25/37 18 46 39.13 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER L 30/35 11 52 21.15 4 NORENE BATTIE L 19/37 11 38 28.94 1 VERA WHITNACK L 16/36 14 36 38.88 10 WANDA OERLEMANS W 1/0 0 0 None 6 SHARON FRASER L 13/35 6 30 20.00 7 MARIE LALONDE W 35/23 19 48 39.58 5 BARB KERR L 31/35 20 52 38.46 - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 38%) TOTALS W 2 L 7 115 352 32.67 10 WANDA OERLEMANS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 SIMONE SCHNEIDER L 0/1 0 0 None 6 SHARON FRASER L 0/1 0 0 None 1 VERA WHITNACK L 0/1 0 0 None 3 YVONNE GREAVES L 0/1 0 0 None 2 DAWN WARWICK L 0/1 0 0 None 9 GERDA RUS L 0/1 0 0 None 5 BARB KERR L 0/1 0 0 None 4 NORENE BATTIE L 0/1 0 0 None 7 MARIE LALONDE L 0/1 0 0 None - - - B Y E - - - - - -- -- ----- (Was 37%) TOTALS W 0 L 9 0 0 0.00 This Class Pitched on Day 1 Shift 2 and Day 2 Shift 3 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS D (35 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DENISE MICHALSKI BC 1018 8 2 337 150 400 37.50% 2* BEV UNDERWOOD BC 0187 7 3 312 147 448 32.81% 3* VERNA PARSLOW BC 3905 7 3 298 128 394 32.48% 4 DIANE SCHAEFER BC 0403 4 6 271 113 436 25.91% 5** DOROTHY BYRNE BC 0163 2 8 262 113 492 22.96% 6** SHELLY KOPP BC 0207 2 8 195 80 410 19.51% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DENISE MICHALSKI - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 23/35 13 40 32.50 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 35/17 17 32 53.12 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 24/36 15 42 35.71 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 36/20 14 36 38.88 6 SHELLY KOPP W 37/20 14 38 36.84 3 VERNA PARSLOW W 37/8 17 26 65.38 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 35/23 9 48 18.75 2 BEV UNDERWOOD W 37/17 16 44 36.36 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 36/31 18 54 33.33 6 SHELLY KOPP W 37/16 17 40 42.50 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 150 400 37.50 2* BEV UNDERWOOD - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 35/26 13 40 32.50 6 SHELLY KOPP W 36/0 12 26 46.15 1 DENISE MICHALSKI W 36/24 19 42 45.23 4 DIANE SCHAEFER L 30/38 15 66 22.72 3 VERNA PARSLOW W 35/8 17 44 38.63 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 35/22 18 54 33.33 6 SHELLY KOPP W 38/32 17 46 36.95 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 17/37 10 44 22.72 4 DIANE SCHAEFER L 15/36 7 36 19.44 3 VERNA PARSLOW W 35/31 19 50 38.00 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 147 448 32.81 3* VERNA PARSLOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DENISE MICHALSKI W 35/23 17 40 42.50 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 35/21 17 50 34.00 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 35/19 12 48 25.00 6 SHELLY KOPP W 35/8 13 38 34.21 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 8/35 9 44 20.45 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 8/37 7 26 26.92 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 37/19 13 46 28.26 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 38/4 13 22 59.09 6 SHELLY KOPP W 36/9 10 30 33.33 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 31/35 17 50 34.00 (Was 26%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 128 394 32.48 4 DIANE SCHAEFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SHELLY KOPP L 34/36 10 52 19.23 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 17/35 12 32 37.50 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 19/35 10 48 20.83 2 BEV UNDERWOOD W 38/30 16 66 24.24 5 DOROTHY BYRNE L 27/37 14 60 23.33 6 SHELLY KOPP W 37/12 13 30 43.33 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 23/35 8 48 16.66 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 4/38 3 22 13.63 2 BEV UNDERWOOD W 36/15 13 36 36.11 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 36/23 14 42 33.33 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 113 436 25.91 5** DOROTHY BYRNE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 26/35 8 40 20.00 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 21/35 13 50 26.00 6 SHELLY KOPP W 35/27 13 50 26.00 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 20/36 9 36 25.00 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 37/27 15 60 25.00 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 22/35 14 54 25.92 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 19/37 9 46 19.56 6 SHELLY KOPP L 28/35 6 60 10.00 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 31/36 16 54 29.62 4 DIANE SCHAEFER L 23/36 10 42 23.80 (Was 31%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 113 492 22.96 6** SHELLY KOPP - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DIANE SCHAEFER W 36/34 13 52 25.00 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 0/36 2 26 7.69 5 DOROTHY BYRNE L 27/35 11 50 22.00 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 8/35 7 38 18.42 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 20/37 8 38 21.05 4 DIANE SCHAEFER L 12/37 4 30 13.33 2 BEV UNDERWOOD L 32/38 14 46 30.43 5 DOROTHY BYRNE W 35/28 8 60 13.33 3 VERNA PARSLOW L 9/36 2 30 6.66 1 DENISE MICHALSKI L 16/37 11 40 27.50 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 80 410 19.51 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS E (30 Points) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS BC 3160 8 2 282 91 346 26.30% 2 IRENE GOODMAN BC 0533 7 3 260 77 404 19.05% 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF BC 0649 5 5 267 85 396 21.46% 4* PATTY HAMMERMASTER BC 3995 5 5 232 79 420 18.80% 5 JOAN THOMPSON BC 0205 3 7 172 58 394 14.72% 6 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 2 8 160 42 384 10.93% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 30/23 11 42 26.19 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/7 9 30 30.00 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 26/30 9 46 19.56 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 32/10 9 36 25.00 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 30/10 9 38 23.68 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 8/30 5 32 15.62 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/4 9 22 40.90 2 IRENE GOODMAN W 32/18 12 42 28.57 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 30/10 8 30 26.66 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 32/10 10 28 35.71 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 91 346 26.30 2 IRENE GOODMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/7 10 36 27.77 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 30/15 6 48 12.50 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 30/26 11 46 23.91 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 32/29 8 46 17.39 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 33/6 10 28 35.71 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/25 6 44 13.63 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 8/32 4 32 12.50 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 18/32 5 42 11.90 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 34/10 10 32 31.25 5 JOAN THOMPSON L 13/31 7 50 14.00 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 77 404 19.05 3* CHERYL BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 23/30 9 42 21.42 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 31/11 9 36 25.00 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 21/31 8 46 17.39 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 29/32 8 46 17.39 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/18 7 44 15.90 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS W 30/8 11 32 34.37 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 33/18 10 38 26.31 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 28/31 12 52 23.07 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 10/34 4 32 12.50 6 SUE BERTRAND W 31/7 7 28 25.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 85 396 21.46 4* PATTY HAMMERMASTER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 30/9 8 42 19.04 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 15/30 4 48 8.33 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 31/21 12 46 26.08 6 SUE BERTRAND L 23/32 7 50 14.00 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 10/30 5 38 13.15 5 JOAN THOMPSON L 20/30 6 44 13.63 2 IRENE GOODMAN W 32/8 13 32 40.62 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF W 31/28 14 52 26.92 6 SUE BERTRAND W 30/14 6 40 15.00 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 10/32 4 28 14.28 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 79 420 18.80 5 JOAN THOMPSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 9/30 2 42 4.76 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 11/31 3 36 8.33 6 SUE BERTRAND L 17/30 8 44 18.18 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 10/32 3 36 8.33 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 6/33 3 28 10.71 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 30/20 11 44 25.00 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 18/33 5 38 13.15 6 SUE BERTRAND W 30/16 7 46 15.21 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 10/30 3 30 10.00 2 IRENE GOODMAN W 31/13 13 50 26.00 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 58 394 14.72 6 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 7/31 3 36 8.33 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 7/31 2 30 6.66 5 JOAN THOMPSON W 30/17 11 44 25.00 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 32/23 10 50 20.00 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 18/31 4 44 9.09 2 IRENE GOODMAN L 25/31 6 44 13.63 1 SHIRLEY HOPKINS L 4/31 0 22 0.00 5 JOAN THOMPSON L 16/30 1 46 2.17 4 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 14/30 3 40 7.50 3 CHERYL BRIETKOPF L 7/31 2 28 7.14 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 42 384 10.93 THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS - ABBOTSFORD - September 2, 2000 WOMEN - CLASS F (30Pts/40Sh) OFFICIAL RESULTS AS AT 00:38 ON 09/04/00 PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 VIOLET GALLANT BC 1023 11 1 355 101 394 25.63% 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF BC 0062 8 4 228 39 438 8.90% 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN BC 4 8 152 41 474 8.64% 4 ALICE LAFLAMME BC 0578 1 11 142 24 450 5.33% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 VIOLET GALLANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 31/12 5 38 13.15 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 20/8 2 40 5.00 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 31/2 8 22 36.36 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 31/0 8 22 36.36 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/5 10 32 31.25 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 23/26 9 40 22.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 32/1 10 28 35.71 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 31/11 11 38 28.94 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 31/6 11 32 34.37 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 33/13 9 36 25.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 29/11 8 40 20.00 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 31/2 10 26 38.46 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 101 394 25.63 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 32/9 8 38 21.05 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 26/20 6 40 15.00 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 2/31 0 22 0.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 26/11 4 40 10.00 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 24/16 4 40 10.00 1 VIOLET GALLANT W 26/23 7 40 17.50 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 16/24 1 40 2.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 20/14 1 40 2.50 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 6/31 2 32 6.25 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 27/10 3 40 7.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 21/10 3 40 7.50 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 2/31 0 26 0.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 8 L 4 39 438 8.90 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 9/32 5 38 13.15 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 8/20 1 40 2.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME L 10/14 3 40 7.50 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 11/26 4 40 10.00 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 5/32 2 32 6.25 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 18/9 3 40 7.50 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF W 24/16 7 40 17.50 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 11/31 5 38 13.15 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 20/19 3 46 6.52 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 10/27 2 40 5.00 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 11/29 3 40 7.50 4 ALICE LAFLAMME W 15/14 3 40 7.50 (Was 4%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 41 474 8.64 4 ALICE LAFLAMME - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 12/31 2 38 5.26 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 20/26 4 40 10.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 14/10 3 40 7.50 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 0/31 0 22 0.00 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 16/24 4 40 10.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 9/18 0 40 0.00 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 1/32 1 28 3.57 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 14/20 3 40 7.50 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 19/20 4 46 8.69 1 VIOLET GALLANT L 13/33 1 36 2.77 2 CHERYL DEGRAAF L 10/21 1 40 2.50 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 14/15 1 40 2.50 (Was 5%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 24 450 5.33