THE BRITISH COLUMBIA HORSESHOE ASSOCIATION B.C. INTERNATIONAL - WINFIELD - May 19, 2001 MEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# GORDON BUTTS BC 4202 10 3 508 319 590 54.06% 2 LLOYD REYKLIN BC 0369 9 4 488 294 630 46.66% 3 ERICH SCHAEFER BC 0405 7 5 427 274 652 42.02% 4 HORST HESSE BC 4814 4 8 330 198 550 36.00% 5 ANDY DANYLEKO BC 9758 1 11 264 155 530 29.24% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# GORDON BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 36/42 26 56 46.42 4 HORST HESSE W 40/27 27 50 54.00 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 41/21 24 46 52.17 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 39/41 31 58 53.44 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 24/40 15 38 39.47 4 HORST HESSE W 41/4 13 28 46.42 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 40/18 19 38 50.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN W 40/32 45 72 62.50 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 45/23 29 58 50.00 4 HORST HESSE W 40/6 18 30 60.00 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 42/1 17 26 65.38 2 LLOYD REYKLIN W 40/20 26 40 65.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN W 40/21 29 50 58.00 (Was 53%) TOTALS W 10 L 3 319 590 54.06 2 LLOYD REYKLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 40/9 18 36 50.00 4 HORST HESSE W 40/5 19 36 52.77 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 43/21 19 36 52.77 1 GORDON BUTTS W 41/39 31 58 53.44 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 42/20 20 46 43.47 4 HORST HESSE W 41/23 20 34 58.82 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 43/36 27 64 42.18 1 GORDON BUTTS L 32/40 39 72 54.16 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 42/19 12 36 33.33 4 HORST HESSE W 44/24 20 46 43.47 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 39/41 29 76 38.15 1 GORDON BUTTS L 20/40 18 40 45.00 1 GORDON BUTTS L 21/40 22 50 44.00 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 9 L 4 294 630 46.66 3 ERICH SCHAEFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 GORDON BUTTS W 42/36 29 56 51.78 5 ANDY DANYLEKO L 28/45 12 48 25.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 21/43 13 36 36.11 4 HORST HESSE W 45/37 33 62 53.22 1 GORDON BUTTS W 40/24 22 38 57.89 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 40/16 24 52 46.15 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 36/43 27 64 42.18 4 HORST HESSE W 41/36 24 56 42.85 1 GORDON BUTTS L 23/45 22 58 37.93 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 41/31 18 50 36.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN W 41/39 34 76 44.73 4 HORST HESSE L 29/43 16 56 28.57 (Was 52%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 274 652 42.02 4 HORST HESSE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 41/33 26 58 44.82 1 GORDON BUTTS L 27/40 24 50 48.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 5/40 9 36 25.00 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 37/45 28 62 45.16 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 40/27 14 50 28.00 1 GORDON BUTTS L 4/41 3 28 10.71 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 23/41 14 34 41.17 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 36/41 21 56 37.50 5 ANDY DANYLEKO W 44/24 21 44 47.72 1 GORDON BUTTS L 6/40 7 30 23.33 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 24/44 13 46 28.26 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 43/29 18 56 32.14 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 198 550 36.00 5 ANDY DANYLEKO - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 HORST HESSE L 33/41 23 58 39.65 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 9/40 8 36 22.22 3 ERICH SCHAEFER W 45/28 17 48 35.41 1 GORDON BUTTS L 21/41 17 46 36.95 4 HORST HESSE L 27/40 11 50 22.00 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 20/42 12 46 26.08 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 16/40 18 52 34.61 1 GORDON BUTTS L 18/40 12 38 31.57 4 HORST HESSE L 24/44 15 44 34.09 2 LLOYD REYKLIN L 19/42 6 36 16.66 3 ERICH SCHAEFER L 31/41 12 50 24.00 1 GORDON BUTTS L 1/42 4 26 15.38 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 155 530 29.24 MEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 LYLE CUTLER BC 1617 7 3 354 194 516 37.59% 2 EARLE ANDERSON BC 1501 6 4 352 167 536 31.15% 3* SAM TOMASEVIC BC 3454 5 5 357 183 496 36.89% 4* FRED ORMISTON BC 3946 5 5 336 176 514 34.24% 5 ALBERT HELLYER BC 3422 4 6 329 169 486 34.77% 6 JOE BRIETKOPF BC 0648 3 7 280 145 492 29.47% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 LYLE CUTLER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SAM TOMASEVIC L 26/42 15 48 31.25 2 EARLE ANDERSON W 42/26 19 48 39.58 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 41/26 20 58 34.48 4 FRED ORMISTON W 40/29 21 48 43.75 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 41/36 27 70 38.57 3 SAM TOMASEVIC W 40/25 22 54 40.74 2 EARLE ANDERSON W 40/34 25 54 46.29 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 42/22 19 40 47.50 4 FRED ORMISTON L 6/42 6 34 17.64 5 ALBERT HELLYER L 36/42 20 62 32.25 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 194 516 37.59 2 EARLE ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 FRED ORMISTON W 43/28 19 62 30.64 1 LYLE CUTLER L 26/42 14 48 29.16 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 42/19 17 46 36.95 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/30 23 78 29.48 3 SAM TOMASEVIC W 42/34 22 62 35.48 4 FRED ORMISTON W 40/29 14 56 25.00 1 LYLE CUTLER L 34/40 21 54 38.88 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 40/24 16 50 32.00 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 13/42 7 34 20.58 3 SAM TOMASEVIC L 32/40 14 46 30.43 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 167 536 31.15 3* SAM TOMASEVIC - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 LYLE CUTLER W 42/26 18 48 37.50 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 39/42 22 58 37.93 4 FRED ORMISTON W 45/21 25 58 43.10 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 41/18 16 36 44.44 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 34/42 19 62 30.64 1 LYLE CUTLER L 25/40 19 54 35.18 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/5 13 28 46.42 4 FRED ORMISTON L 35/42 20 66 30.30 5 ALBERT HELLYER L 16/41 13 40 32.50 2 EARLE ANDERSON W 40/32 18 46 39.13 (Was 40%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 183 496 36.89 4* FRED ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 28/43 15 62 24.19 5 ALBERT HELLYER L 20/40 12 40 30.00 3 SAM TOMASEVIC L 21/45 17 58 29.31 1 LYLE CUTLER L 29/40 19 48 39.58 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 40/23 20 54 37.03 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 29/40 14 56 25.00 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 41/28 19 48 39.58 3 SAM TOMASEVIC W 42/35 24 66 36.36 1 LYLE CUTLER W 42/6 17 34 50.00 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 44/29 19 48 39.58 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 176 514 34.24 5 ALBERT HELLYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 JOE BRIETKOPF L 36/40 16 56 28.57 4 FRED ORMISTON W 40/20 18 40 45.00 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 19/42 11 46 23.91 3 SAM TOMASEVIC L 18/41 10 36 27.77 1 LYLE CUTLER L 36/41 26 70 37.14 6 JOE BRIETKOPF W 45/21 19 38 50.00 4 FRED ORMISTON L 28/41 12 48 25.00 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 24/40 13 50 26.00 3 SAM TOMASEVIC W 41/16 21 40 52.50 1 LYLE CUTLER W 42/36 23 62 37.09 (Was 41%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 169 486 34.77 6 JOE BRIETKOPF - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ALBERT HELLYER W 40/36 17 56 30.35 3 SAM TOMASEVIC W 42/39 20 58 34.48 1 LYLE CUTLER L 26/41 17 58 29.31 2 EARLE ANDERSON L 30/40 21 78 26.92 4 FRED ORMISTON L 23/40 15 54 27.77 5 ALBERT HELLYER L 21/45 11 38 28.94 3 SAM TOMASEVIC L 5/40 2 28 7.14 1 LYLE CUTLER L 22/42 13 40 32.50 2 EARLE ANDERSON W 42/13 16 34 47.05 4 FRED ORMISTON L 29/44 13 48 27.08 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 145 492 29.47 MEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 BERT ALLEN BC 0556 8 2 346 157 426 36.85% 2* RAY AMOS BC 2235 6 4 321 142 482 29.46% 3* DON MORGAN BC 0122 6 4 299 126 438 28.76% 4 LARRY GREGOIRE BC 3423 4 6 266 105 424 24.76% 5** MAURICE STERN BC 2934 3 7 239 122 438 27.85% 6** GERRY REYNOLDS BC 0432 3 7 247 118 492 23.98% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 BERT ALLEN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 GERRY REYNOLDS L 32/38 11 58 18.96 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 36/28 13 40 32.50 2 RAY AMOS W 36/23 17 48 35.41 5 MAURICE STERN W 35/19 17 42 40.47 3 DON MORGAN W 35/21 14 38 36.84 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 37/16 18 36 50.00 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 37/11 19 42 45.23 2 RAY AMOS W 36/28 15 42 35.71 5 MAURICE STERN W 36/5 18 30 60.00 3 DON MORGAN L 26/36 15 50 30.00 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 157 426 36.85 2* RAY AMOS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 35/20 14 38 36.84 3 DON MORGAN L 32/35 18 60 30.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 23/36 13 48 27.08 6 GERRY REYNOLDS L 24/37 10 54 18.51 5 MAURICE STERN W 37/28 17 50 34.00 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 35/19 14 48 29.16 3 DON MORGAN W 37/19 16 40 40.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 28/36 13 42 30.95 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 35/11 12 50 24.00 5 MAURICE STERN W 35/25 15 52 28.84 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 142 482 29.46 3* DON MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 MAURICE STERN W 36/19 14 40 35.00 2 RAY AMOS W 35/32 17 60 28.33 6 GERRY REYNOLDS L 30/38 10 48 20.83 4 LARRY GREGOIRE L 13/36 6 30 20.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 21/35 10 38 26.31 5 MAURICE STERN W 37/17 12 42 28.57 2 RAY AMOS L 19/37 12 40 30.00 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 35/16 14 42 33.33 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 37/24 11 48 22.91 1 BERT ALLEN W 36/26 20 50 40.00 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 126 438 28.76 4 LARRY GREGOIRE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 RAY AMOS L 20/35 11 38 28.94 1 BERT ALLEN L 28/36 8 40 20.00 5 MAURICE STERN W 38/16 14 34 41.17 3 DON MORGAN W 36/13 12 30 40.00 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 36/23 10 50 20.00 2 RAY AMOS L 19/35 11 48 22.91 1 BERT ALLEN L 11/37 9 42 21.42 5 MAURICE STERN L 18/36 7 44 15.90 3 DON MORGAN L 24/37 6 48 12.50 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 36/20 17 50 34.00 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 105 424 24.76 5** MAURICE STERN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 DON MORGAN L 19/36 8 40 20.00 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 35/28 19 58 32.75 4 LARRY GREGOIRE L 16/38 7 34 20.58 1 BERT ALLEN L 19/35 13 42 30.95 2 RAY AMOS L 28/37 14 50 28.00 3 DON MORGAN L 17/37 5 42 11.90 6 GERRY REYNOLDS W 39/20 19 46 41.30 4 LARRY GREGOIRE W 36/18 15 44 34.09 1 BERT ALLEN L 5/36 8 30 26.66 2 RAY AMOS L 25/35 14 52 26.92 (Was 34%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 122 438 27.85 6** GERRY REYNOLDS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 BERT ALLEN W 38/32 15 58 25.86 5 MAURICE STERN L 28/35 15 58 25.86 3 DON MORGAN W 38/30 12 48 25.00 2 RAY AMOS W 37/24 12 54 22.22 4 LARRY GREGOIRE L 23/36 7 50 14.00 1 BERT ALLEN L 16/37 12 36 33.33 5 MAURICE STERN L 20/39 13 46 28.26 3 DON MORGAN L 16/35 9 42 21.42 2 RAY AMOS L 11/35 9 50 18.00 4 LARRY GREGOIRE L 20/36 14 50 28.00 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 118 492 23.98 MEN - CLASS D (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ED NICHOLAS BC 0140 9 1 349 111 460 24.13% 2 NORM LEBRUN BC 2815 6 4 303 110 624 17.62% 3 VINCE HERKEL BC 3306 5 5 281 94 536 17.53% 4 DICK HOPKINS BC 3159 4 6 272 110 542 20.29% 5* BOB FEDORUK BC 0289 3 7 289 97 542 17.89% 6* TOM HARRIS BC 0525 3 7 230 60 488 12.29% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ED NICHOLAS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 NORM LEBRUN W 35/16 11 42 26.19 5 BOB FEDORUK W 36/34 11 64 17.18 4 DICK HOPKINS W 37/31 11 62 17.74 3 VINCE HERKEL W 35/13 9 38 23.68 6 TOM HARRIS W 35/16 11 46 23.91 2 NORM LEBRUN W 35/18 11 42 26.19 5 BOB FEDORUK W 37/26 16 54 29.62 4 DICK HOPKINS W 38/8 10 42 23.80 3 VINCE HERKEL L 24/38 8 40 20.00 6 TOM HARRIS W 37/6 13 30 43.33 (Was 27%) TOTALS W 9 L 1 111 460 24.13 2 NORM LEBRUN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ED NICHOLAS L 16/35 6 42 14.28 6 TOM HARRIS L 29/36 12 62 19.35 5 BOB FEDORUK L 20/35 4 62 6.45 4 DICK HOPKINS W 36/25 14 74 18.91 3 VINCE HERKEL W 35/31 10 62 16.12 1 ED NICHOLAS L 18/35 6 42 14.28 6 TOM HARRIS W 37/30 15 64 23.43 5 BOB FEDORUK W 38/29 14 58 24.13 4 DICK HOPKINS W 39/29 17 44 38.63 3 VINCE HERKEL W 35/12 12 114 10.52 (Was 28%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 110 624 17.62 3 VINCE HERKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BOB FEDORUK W 35/18 10 48 20.83 4 DICK HOPKINS L 34/37 14 64 21.87 6 TOM HARRIS L 11/35 3 42 7.14 1 ED NICHOLAS L 13/35 4 38 10.52 2 NORM LEBRUN L 31/35 9 62 14.51 5 BOB FEDORUK W 35/29 11 44 25.00 4 DICK HOPKINS W 35/8 12 40 30.00 6 TOM HARRIS W 37/17 11 44 25.00 1 ED NICHOLAS W 38/24 13 40 32.50 2 NORM LEBRUN L 12/35 7 114 6.14 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 94 536 17.53 4 DICK HOPKINS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TOM HARRIS W 37/17 13 54 24.07 3 VINCE HERKEL W 37/34 14 64 21.87 1 ED NICHOLAS L 31/37 11 62 17.74 2 NORM LEBRUN L 25/36 13 74 17.56 5 BOB FEDORUK W 37/20 13 60 21.66 6 TOM HARRIS L 23/36 11 48 22.91 3 VINCE HERKEL L 8/35 4 40 10.00 1 ED NICHOLAS L 8/38 3 42 7.14 2 NORM LEBRUN L 29/39 12 44 27.27 5 BOB FEDORUK W 37/26 16 54 29.62 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 110 542 20.29 5* BOB FEDORUK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 VINCE HERKEL L 18/35 4 48 8.33 1 ED NICHOLAS L 34/36 12 64 18.75 2 NORM LEBRUN W 35/20 8 62 12.90 6 TOM HARRIS W 36/23 10 58 17.24 4 DICK HOPKINS L 20/37 7 60 11.66 3 VINCE HERKEL L 29/35 9 44 20.45 1 ED NICHOLAS L 26/37 12 54 22.22 2 NORM LEBRUN L 29/38 12 58 20.68 6 TOM HARRIS W 36/14 10 40 25.00 4 DICK HOPKINS L 26/37 13 54 24.07 (Was 22%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 97 542 17.89 6* TOM HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DICK HOPKINS L 17/37 5 54 9.25 2 NORM LEBRUN W 36/29 10 62 16.12 3 VINCE HERKEL W 35/11 6 42 14.28 5 BOB FEDORUK L 23/36 7 58 12.06 1 ED NICHOLAS L 16/35 4 46 8.69 4 DICK HOPKINS W 36/23 11 48 22.91 2 NORM LEBRUN L 30/37 10 64 15.62 3 VINCE HERKEL L 17/37 4 44 9.09 5 BOB FEDORUK L 14/36 1 40 2.50 1 ED NICHOLAS L 6/37 2 30 6.66 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 60 488 12.29 MEN - CLASS E (30 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 DAN COFFIN BC 3287 10 0 316 100 434 23.04% 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON BC 3994 6 4 245 52 462 11.25% 3 SYD ANDERSON BC 0401 5 5 255 52 502 10.35% 4 DALE DONAHUE BC 2232 4 6 221 72 540 13.33% 5 FRED VIENNEAU BC 2941 3 7 225 64 478 13.38% 6 CLOVIS TOUSIGNANT BC 0508 2 8 198 63 472 13.34% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 DAN COFFIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SYD ANDERSON W 33/11 8 36 22.22 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 32/15 14 42 33.33 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 31/18 9 48 18.75 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 33/20 7 50 14.00 4 DALE DONAHUE W 31/13 9 40 22.50 3 SYD ANDERSON W 32/14 12 34 35.29 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 31/14 9 50 18.00 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 31/19 13 44 29.54 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 31/5 10 30 33.33 4 DALE DONAHUE W 31/25 9 60 15.00 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 100 434 23.04 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 30/21 7 56 12.50 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 30/27 7 42 16.66 4 DALE DONAHUE W 30/14 5 58 8.62 1 DAN COFFIN L 20/33 3 50 6.00 3 SYD ANDERSON L 11/30 3 40 7.50 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 32/18 8 44 18.18 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 32/25 6 52 11.53 4 DALE DONAHUE W 30/7 7 34 20.58 1 DAN COFFIN L 5/31 2 30 6.66 3 SYD ANDERSON L 25/30 4 56 7.14 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 6 L 4 52 462 11.25 3 SYD ANDERSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 DAN COFFIN L 11/33 2 36 5.55 4 DALE DONAHUE L 25/31 7 62 11.29 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 30/11 6 40 15.00 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 33/18 6 64 9.37 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 30/11 8 40 20.00 1 DAN COFFIN L 14/32 5 34 14.70 4 DALE DONAHUE L 28/31 4 66 6.06 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 24/32 2 56 3.57 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 30/22 6 48 12.50 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON W 30/25 6 56 10.71 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 52 502 10.35 4 DALE DONAHUE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 FRED VIENNEAU L 15/30 5 54 9.25 3 SYD ANDERSON W 31/25 14 62 22.58 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 14/30 4 58 6.89 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 31/21 8 64 12.50 1 DAN COFFIN L 13/31 5 40 12.50 5 FRED VIENNEAU L 23/30 8 54 14.81 3 SYD ANDERSON W 31/28 8 66 12.12 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 7/30 2 34 5.88 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 31/28 8 48 16.66 1 DAN COFFIN L 25/31 10 60 16.66 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 72 540 13.33 5 FRED VIENNEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DALE DONAHUE W 30/15 8 54 14.81 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 27/30 7 42 16.66 1 DAN COFFIN L 18/31 5 48 10.41 3 SYD ANDERSON L 18/33 4 64 6.25 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT L 5/31 2 32 6.25 4 DALE DONAHUE W 30/23 10 54 18.51 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 25/32 7 52 13.46 1 DAN COFFIN L 19/31 9 44 20.45 3 SYD ANDERSON L 22/30 6 48 12.50 6 CLOVI TOUSIGNANT W 31/7 6 40 15.00 (Was 17%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 64 478 13.38 6 CLOVIS TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 21/30 7 56 12.50 1 DAN COFFIN L 15/32 10 42 23.80 3 SYD ANDERSON L 11/30 2 40 5.00 4 DALE DONAHUE L 21/31 4 64 6.25 5 FRED VIENNEAU W 31/5 8 32 25.00 2 BUNNY DAVIDSON L 18/32 6 44 13.63 1 DAN COFFIN L 14/31 6 50 12.00 3 SYD ANDERSON W 32/24 10 56 17.85 4 DALE DONAHUE L 28/31 8 48 16.66 5 FRED VIENNEAU L 7/31 2 40 5.00 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 63 472 13.34 WOMEN - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE BC 0306 10 0 414 260 414 62.80% 2 DORIS WILTON BC 9757 8 2 380 280 500 56.00% 3 VERA WHITNACK BC 3335 4 6 260 187 452 41.37% 4* CAROL ORMISTON BC 3903 3 7 273 206 452 45.57% 5* DOROTHY BUTTS BC 4201 3 7 264 206 482 42.73% 6 VERNA WEINGARDT BC 9778 2 8 237 161 436 36.92% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/17 20 36 55.55 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/4 16 26 61.53 3 VERA WHITNACK W 40/6 17 28 60.71 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 40/17 26 42 61.90 2 DORIS WILTON W 43/32 55 80 68.75 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 43/6 21 32 65.62 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 43/20 25 48 52.08 3 VERA WHITNACK W 42/12 21 32 65.62 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 41/22 24 42 57.14 2 DORIS WILTON W 42/12 35 48 72.91 (Was 60%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 260 414 62.80 2 DORIS WILTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 VERA WHITNACK W 41/11 20 44 45.45 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 43/6 19 30 63.33 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 45/21 29 54 53.70 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 40/32 32 52 61.53 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 32/43 51 80 63.75 3 VERA WHITNACK W 42/31 31 60 51.66 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 40/17 18 34 52.94 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 44/16 26 48 54.16 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/18 29 50 58.00 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 12/42 25 48 52.08 (Was 62%) TOTALS W 8 L 2 280 500 56.00 3 VERA WHITNACK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 DORIS WILTON L 11/41 9 44 20.45 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 7/42 8 34 23.52 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 6/40 7 28 25.00 6 VERNA WEINGARDT L 21/41 18 40 45.00 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 40/14 29 50 58.00 2 DORIS WILTON L 31/42 26 60 43.33 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 45/36 25 56 44.64 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 12/42 10 32 31.25 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 44/16 25 40 62.50 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 43/38 30 68 44.11 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 4 L 6 187 452 41.37 4* CAROL ORMISTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 17/40 12 36 33.33 3 VERA WHITNACK W 42/7 20 34 58.82 5 DOROTHY BUTTS W 42/22 31 62 50.00 2 DORIS WILTON L 32/40 29 52 55.76 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 41/18 19 36 52.77 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 6/43 11 32 34.37 3 VERA WHITNACK L 36/45 24 56 42.85 5 DOROTHY BUTTS L 20/45 22 52 42.30 2 DORIS WILTON L 18/41 23 50 46.00 6 VERNA WEINGARDT L 19/41 15 42 35.71 (Was 59%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 206 452 45.57 5* DOROTHY BUTTS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 40/25 23 44 52.27 2 DORIS WILTON L 6/43 9 30 30.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 22/42 23 62 37.09 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 17/40 18 42 42.85 3 VERA WHITNACK L 14/40 20 50 40.00 6 VERNA WEINGARDT W 43/35 24 58 41.37 2 DORIS WILTON L 17/40 11 34 32.35 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 45/20 30 52 57.69 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 22/41 19 42 45.23 3 VERA WHITNACK L 38/43 29 68 42.64 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 206 482 42.73 6 VERNA WEINGARDT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DOROTHY BUTTS L 25/40 17 44 38.63 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 4/40 5 26 19.23 2 DORIS WILTON L 21/45 20 54 37.03 3 VERA WHITNACK W 41/21 22 40 55.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON L 18/41 10 36 27.77 5 DOROTHY BUTTS L 35/43 18 58 31.03 1 ELYSE BRUNELLE L 20/43 17 48 35.41 2 DORIS WILTON L 16/44 17 48 35.41 3 VERA WHITNACK L 16/44 14 40 35.00 4 CAROL ORMISTON W 41/19 21 42 50.00 (Was 47%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 161 436 36.92 WOMEN - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# ELAINE STERN BC 2936 10 3 475 312 676 46.15% 2 YVONNE GREAVES BC 9767 9 4 504 292 644 45.34% 3 EVA ALBERT BC 9754 6 6 400 242 588 41.15% 4 BETTY REYKLIN BC 0368 4 8 342 207 598 34.61% 5 ANNIE RAYNER BC 0739 2 10 327 210 630 33.33% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# ELAINE STERN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 20/40 24 54 44.44 3 EVA ALBERT W 41/10 20 38 52.63 4 BETTY REYKLIN L 16/45 15 46 32.60 5 ANNIE RAYNER L 30/42 16 56 28.57 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 42/34 29 54 53.70 3 EVA ALBERT W 40/29 29 48 60.41 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 40/24 26 44 59.09 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 43/39 28 58 48.27 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 41/38 31 74 41.89 3 EVA ALBERT W 40/17 24 46 52.17 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 41/31 22 48 45.83 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 41/29 22 48 45.83 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 40/37 26 62 41.93 (Was 46%) TOTALS W 10 L 3 312 676 46.15 2 YVONNE GREAVES - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 EVA ALBERT W 41/28 22 46 47.82 1 ELAINE STERN W 40/20 29 54 53.70 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 43/11 17 40 42.50 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/2 23 34 67.64 3 EVA ALBERT L 27/40 22 56 39.28 1 ELAINE STERN L 34/42 25 54 46.29 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 40/32 23 56 41.07 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/13 23 48 47.91 3 EVA ALBERT W 42/32 21 48 43.75 1 ELAINE STERN L 38/41 27 74 36.48 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 40/0 17 28 60.71 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/16 20 44 45.45 1 ELAINE STERN L 37/40 23 62 37.09 (Was 39%) TOTALS W 9 L 4 292 644 45.34 3 EVA ALBERT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 28/41 19 46 41.30 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 40/39 20 48 41.66 1 ELAINE STERN L 10/41 9 38 23.68 4 BETTY REYKLIN L 35/41 22 60 36.66 2 YVONNE GREAVES W 40/27 23 56 41.07 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 44/12 31 54 57.40 1 ELAINE STERN L 29/40 24 48 50.00 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 41/26 22 52 42.30 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 32/42 17 48 35.41 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 43/26 24 54 44.44 1 ELAINE STERN L 17/40 15 46 32.60 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 41/14 16 38 42.10 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 6 L 6 242 588 41.15 4 BETTY REYKLIN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 ANNIE RAYNER L 34/44 17 52 32.69 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 11/43 7 40 17.50 1 ELAINE STERN W 45/16 23 46 50.00 3 EVA ALBERT W 41/35 26 60 43.33 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/36 24 80 30.00 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 32/40 21 56 37.50 1 ELAINE STERN L 24/40 20 44 45.45 3 EVA ALBERT L 26/41 16 52 30.76 5 ANNIE RAYNER W 42/29 21 54 38.88 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 0/40 5 28 17.85 1 ELAINE STERN L 31/41 17 48 35.41 3 EVA ALBERT L 14/41 10 38 26.31 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 207 598 34.61 5 ANNIE RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 BETTY REYKLIN W 44/34 16 52 30.76 3 EVA ALBERT L 39/40 20 48 41.66 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 2/42 10 34 29.41 1 ELAINE STERN W 42/30 17 56 30.35 4 BETTY REYKLIN L 36/42 23 80 28.75 3 EVA ALBERT L 12/44 21 54 38.88 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 13/40 15 48 31.25 1 ELAINE STERN L 39/43 23 58 39.65 4 BETTY REYKLIN L 29/42 17 54 31.48 3 EVA ALBERT L 26/43 20 54 37.03 2 YVONNE GREAVES L 16/40 12 44 27.27 1 ELAINE STERN L 29/41 16 48 33.33 (Was 44%) TOTALS W 2 L 10 210 630 33.33 WOMEN - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# SHARON FRASER BC 0151 9 4 435 211 588 35.88% 2 CAROL PERRY BC 3407 8 5 402 187 570 32.80% 3 YVONNE HELLYER BC 6420 7 5 382 169 508 33.26% 4 GWEN PARKS BC 9772 1 11 220 116 498 23.29% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# SHARON FRASER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 YVONNE HELLYER W 35/26 17 52 32.69 4 GWEN PARKS W 38/17 11 36 30.55 2 CAROL PERRY L 19/38 11 40 27.50 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 34/37 15 50 30.00 4 GWEN PARKS W 36/8 10 26 38.46 2 CAROL PERRY W 36/27 19 48 39.58 3 YVONNE HELLYER W 37/23 18 50 36.00 4 GWEN PARKS L 33/37 27 64 42.18 2 CAROL PERRY W 37/25 21 50 42.00 3 YVONNE HELLYER W 37/29 18 44 40.90 4 GWEN PARKS W 35/10 17 44 38.63 2 CAROL PERRY L 23/36 11 40 27.50 2 CAROL PERRY W 35/16 16 44 36.36 (Was 35%) TOTALS W 9 L 4 211 588 35.88 2 CAROL PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 GWEN PARKS W 36/31 10 60 16.66 3 YVONNE HELLYER W 39/28 16 46 34.78 1 SHARON FRASER W 38/19 17 40 42.50 4 GWEN PARKS W 36/13 17 38 44.73 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 32/35 12 48 25.00 1 SHARON FRASER L 27/36 17 48 35.41 4 GWEN PARKS W 37/34 17 52 32.69 3 YVONNE HELLYER W 36/25 13 38 34.21 1 SHARON FRASER L 25/37 18 50 36.00 4 GWEN PARKS W 36/10 13 32 40.62 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 8/35 8 34 23.52 1 SHARON FRASER W 36/23 16 40 40.00 1 SHARON FRASER L 16/35 13 44 29.54 (Was 36%) TOTALS W 8 L 5 187 570 32.80 3 YVONNE HELLYER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 SHARON FRASER L 26/35 14 52 26.92 2 CAROL PERRY L 28/39 14 46 30.43 4 GWEN PARKS W 37/13 15 34 44.11 1 SHARON FRASER W 37/34 16 50 32.00 2 CAROL PERRY W 35/32 12 48 25.00 4 GWEN PARKS W 35/8 14 26 53.84 1 SHARON FRASER L 23/37 15 50 30.00 2 CAROL PERRY L 25/36 9 38 23.68 4 GWEN PARKS W 35/28 17 48 35.41 1 SHARON FRASER L 29/37 15 44 34.09 2 CAROL PERRY W 35/8 15 34 44.11 4 GWEN PARKS W 37/11 13 38 34.21 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 169 508 33.26 4 GWEN PARKS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 CAROL PERRY L 31/36 7 60 11.66 1 SHARON FRASER L 17/38 6 36 16.66 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 13/37 6 34 17.64 2 CAROL PERRY L 13/36 8 38 21.05 1 SHARON FRASER L 8/36 2 26 7.69 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 8/35 5 26 19.23 2 CAROL PERRY L 34/37 14 52 26.92 1 SHARON FRASER W 37/33 30 64 46.87 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 28/35 16 48 33.33 2 CAROL PERRY L 10/36 4 32 12.50 1 SHARON FRASER L 10/35 11 44 25.00 3 YVONNE HELLYER L 11/37 7 38 18.42 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 1 L 11 116 498 23.29 WOMEN - CLASS D (25 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 CINDY HELGESON BC 3969 9 3 293 82 462 17.74% 2 PATTY HAMMERMASTER BC 3995 7 5 271 57 520 10.96% 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN BC 5 7 244 60 488 12.29% 4 SUE BERTRAND BC 0312 3 9 202 46 514 8.94% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 CINDY HELGESON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 25/17 5 42 11.90 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/9 9 34 26.47 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 26/12 6 34 17.64 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 21/28 7 48 14.58 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/14 6 42 14.28 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 26/14 7 28 25.00 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 20/25 5 36 13.88 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/19 8 44 18.18 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 28/24 8 52 15.38 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 20/27 9 40 22.50 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/8 7 20 35.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 27/13 5 42 11.90 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 9 L 3 82 462 17.74 2 PATTY HAMMERMASTER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 CINDY HELGESON L 17/25 4 42 9.52 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 25/15 4 38 10.52 4 SUE BERTRAND W 26/10 4 48 8.33 1 CINDY HELGESON W 28/21 6 48 12.50 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 14/25 2 32 6.25 4 SUE BERTRAND L 20/25 2 52 3.84 1 CINDY HELGESON W 25/20 5 36 13.88 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 17/25 5 42 11.90 4 SUE BERTRAND L 22/26 6 52 11.53 1 CINDY HELGESON W 27/20 10 40 25.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 25/21 4 44 9.09 4 SUE BERTRAND W 25/16 5 46 10.86 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 57 520 10.96 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 SUE BERTRAND W 27/15 8 40 20.00 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 15/25 2 38 5.26 1 CINDY HELGESON L 12/26 3 34 8.82 4 SUE BERTRAND W 28/10 6 44 13.63 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 25/14 6 32 18.75 1 CINDY HELGESON L 14/26 5 28 17.85 4 SUE BERTRAND L 14/27 4 38 10.52 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 25/17 7 42 16.66 1 CINDY HELGESON L 24/28 9 52 17.30 4 SUE BERTRAND W 26/23 4 54 7.40 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 21/25 4 44 9.09 1 CINDY HELGESON L 13/27 2 42 4.76 (Was 7%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 60 488 12.29 4 SUE BERTRAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 15/27 3 40 7.50 1 CINDY HELGESON L 9/25 5 34 14.70 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 10/26 0 48 0.00 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 10/28 0 44 0.00 1 CINDY HELGESON L 14/25 5 42 11.90 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 25/20 5 52 9.61 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN W 27/14 5 38 13.15 1 CINDY HELGESON L 19/25 8 44 18.18 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER W 26/22 7 52 13.46 3 SYLVIANNE MORGAN L 23/26 4 54 7.40 1 CINDY HELGESON L 8/25 2 20 10.00 2 PAT HAMMERMASTER L 16/25 2 46 4.34 (Was 24%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 46 514 8.94 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS A (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1# NEIL YASKOW BC 3136 14 1 594 411 666 61.71% 2 WILF GREGORY BC 3293 13 2 575 412 676 60.94% 3 RENO CULOS BC 0127 9 5 461 298 582 51.20% 4 OSCAR HOYSETH BC 3171 8 6 492 390 752 51.86% 5 BILL WHITNACK BC 3339 6 8 449 276 640 43.12% 6 BOB HOGAN BC 2938 4 10 332 257 660 38.93% 7 JOHN THORNTON BC 0678 2 12 318 211 600 35.16% 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY BC 1502 1 13 257 230 588 39.11% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1# NEIL YASKOW - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BOB HOGAN W 42/6 28 40 70.00 7 JOHN THORNTON W 42/7 23 40 57.50 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/14 18 32 56.25 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 42/29 26 50 52.00 3 RENO CULOS W 43/23 28 50 56.00 5 BILL WHITNACK W 41/20 27 52 51.92 2 WILF GREGORY L 13/40 17 32 53.12 6 BOB HOGAN W 40/24 29 52 55.76 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/26 26 48 54.16 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 45/7 29 38 76.31 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/29 47 68 69.11 3 RENO CULOS W 40/14 30 44 68.18 5 BILL WHITNACK W 43/16 23 30 76.66 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/11 28 42 66.66 2 WILF GREGORY W 41/22 32 48 66.66 (Was 66%) TOTALS W 14 L 1 411 666 61.71 2 WILF GREGORY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 JOHN THORNTON W 45/13 21 32 65.62 6 BOB HOGAN W 40/12 21 32 65.62 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/31 35 70 50.00 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/15 28 40 70.00 5 BILL WHITNACK W 41/21 28 50 56.00 3 RENO CULOS W 41/8 23 32 71.87 1 NEIL YASKOW W 40/13 26 32 81.25 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/9 20 30 66.66 6 BOB HOGAN W 43/17 22 40 55.00 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/39 49 74 66.21 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/22 36 56 64.28 5 BILL WHITNACK W 45/30 29 50 58.00 3 RENO CULOS W 42/20 31 48 64.58 1 NEIL YASKOW L 11/41 18 42 42.85 1 NEIL YASKOW L 22/41 25 48 52.08 (Was 70%) TOTALS W 13 L 2 412 676 60.94 3 RENO CULOS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 42/19 36 56 64.28 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/9 25 40 62.50 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/1 14 24 58.33 6 BOB HOGAN W 42/14 17 42 40.47 1 NEIL YASKOW L 23/43 21 50 42.00 2 WILF GREGORY L 8/41 12 32 37.50 5 BILL WHITNACK W 43/15 24 48 50.00 4 OSCAR HOYSETH W 40/12 19 38 50.00 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/11 21 32 65.62 7 JOHN THORNTON W 42/15 26 46 56.52 6 BOB HOGAN W 40/12 19 34 55.88 1 NEIL YASKOW L 14/40 22 44 50.00 2 WILF GREGORY L 20/42 22 48 45.83 5 BILL WHITNACK L 27/41 20 48 41.66 (Was 57%) TOTALS W 9 L 5 298 582 51.20 4 OSCAR HOYSETH - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 RENO CULOS L 19/42 31 56 55.35 5 BILL WHITNACK W 45/27 27 48 56.25 2 WILF GREGORY L 31/40 32 70 45.71 1 NEIL YASKOW L 29/42 22 50 44.00 6 BOB HOGAN W 41/18 21 52 40.38 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/33 21 62 33.87 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/25 24 40 60.00 3 RENO CULOS L 12/40 13 38 34.21 5 BILL WHITNACK W 42/31 28 52 53.84 2 WILF GREGORY L 39/40 48 74 64.86 1 NEIL YASKOW L 29/40 44 68 64.70 6 BOB HOGAN W 40/16 26 46 56.52 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/19 27 42 64.28 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/16 26 54 48.14 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 8 L 6 390 752 51.86 5 BILL WHITNACK - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 40/12 15 34 44.11 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 27/45 21 48 43.75 6 BOB HOGAN L 36/42 18 58 31.03 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/34 13 46 28.26 2 WILF GREGORY L 21/41 22 50 44.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 20/41 22 52 42.30 3 RENO CULOS L 15/43 16 48 33.33 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 43/16 17 38 44.73 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 31/42 24 52 46.15 6 BOB HOGAN W 44/16 27 44 61.36 7 JOHN THORNTON W 45/28 18 42 42.85 2 WILF GREGORY L 30/45 23 50 46.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 16/43 14 30 46.66 3 RENO CULOS W 41/27 26 48 54.16 (Was 51%) TOTALS W 6 L 8 276 640 43.12 6 BOB HOGAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 NEIL YASKOW L 6/42 17 40 42.50 2 WILF GREGORY L 12/40 12 32 37.50 5 BILL WHITNACK W 42/36 22 58 37.93 3 RENO CULOS L 14/42 10 42 23.80 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 18/41 15 52 28.84 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY L 30/40 14 48 29.16 7 JOHN THORNTON W 40/36 24 66 36.36 1 NEIL YASKOW L 24/40 27 52 51.92 2 WILF GREGORY L 17/43 14 40 35.00 5 BILL WHITNACK L 16/44 18 44 40.90 3 RENO CULOS L 12/40 12 34 35.29 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 16/40 18 46 39.13 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 44/23 34 60 56.66 7 JOHN THORNTON W 41/14 20 46 43.47 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 4 L 10 257 660 38.93 7 JOHN THORNTON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 WILF GREGORY L 13/45 11 32 34.37 1 NEIL YASKOW L 7/42 11 40 27.50 3 RENO CULOS L 1/40 3 24 12.50 5 BILL WHITNACK L 34/40 12 46 26.08 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 42/22 21 36 58.33 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 33/41 17 62 27.41 6 BOB HOGAN L 36/40 22 66 33.33 2 WILF GREGORY L 9/41 9 30 30.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 26/41 21 48 43.75 3 RENO CULOS L 15/42 21 46 45.65 5 BILL WHITNACK L 28/45 13 42 30.95 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY W 41/25 19 40 47.50 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 19/40 20 42 47.61 6 BOB HOGAN L 14/41 11 46 23.91 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 2 L 12 211 600 35.16 8 ERNIE CONNOLLY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 BILL WHITNACK L 12/40 8 34 23.52 3 RENO CULOS L 9/40 16 40 40.00 1 NEIL YASKOW L 14/40 9 32 28.12 2 WILF GREGORY L 15/42 18 40 45.00 7 JOHN THORNTON L 22/42 15 36 41.66 6 BOB HOGAN W 40/30 17 48 35.41 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 25/42 19 40 47.50 5 BILL WHITNACK L 16/43 9 38 23.68 3 RENO CULOS L 11/40 12 32 37.50 1 NEIL YASKOW L 7/45 17 38 44.73 2 WILF GREGORY L 22/42 30 56 53.57 7 JOHN THORNTON L 25/41 15 40 37.50 6 BOB HOGAN L 23/44 27 60 45.00 4 OSCAR HOYSETH L 16/42 18 54 33.33 (Was 51%) TOTALS W 1 L 13 230 588 39.11 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS B (40 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT BC 1620 13 1 549 305 592 51.52% 2 MEL MCCLELLAND BC 4769 12 2 552 299 624 47.91% 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND ALTA 8886 11 3 520 298 620 48.06% 4 ERVIN ALBERT BC 3106 7 7 467 266 714 37.25% 5 TED PETERS BC 4811 5 9 384 205 702 29.20% 6* TED KUPFERSHMID BC 0507 3 11 331 174 662 26.28% 7* JACK LESLIE BC 0325 3 11 320 165 634 26.02% 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON BC 3148 2 12 404 252 760 33.15% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 41/15 18 36 50.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 43/23 23 46 50.00 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/0 17 20 85.00 5 TED PETERS W 42/21 21 46 45.65 2 MEL MCCLELLAND W 41/26 34 62 54.83 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND W 41/19 24 44 54.54 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 41/8 21 34 61.76 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 40/31 20 48 41.66 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 43/5 17 34 50.00 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/1 13 26 50.00 5 TED PETERS W 43/24 21 40 52.50 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 13/41 16 38 42.10 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND W 40/29 33 62 53.22 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 41/25 27 56 48.21 (Was 42%) TOTALS W 13 L 1 305 592 51.52 2 MEL MCCLELLAND - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 TED PETERS W 41/14 16 44 36.36 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/16 17 38 44.73 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 44/12 19 48 39.58 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 42/22 26 50 52.00 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 26/41 28 62 45.16 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 42/25 24 52 46.15 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND W 40/24 19 40 47.50 5 TED PETERS W 41/16 22 42 52.38 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/5 16 32 50.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 41/8 17 30 56.66 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 45/28 24 50 48.00 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT W 41/13 24 38 63.15 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 40/26 23 44 52.27 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 29/40 24 54 44.44 (Was 49%) TOTALS W 12 L 2 299 624 47.91 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND - ALTA OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/14 17 38 44.73 5 TED PETERS W 42/12 23 44 52.27 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 40/12 16 32 50.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 41/20 20 48 41.66 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 40/31 21 58 36.20 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 19/41 16 44 36.36 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 24/40 14 40 35.00 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/23 18 44 40.90 5 TED PETERS W 40/12 24 36 66.66 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 41/19 21 40 52.50 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/14 22 38 57.89 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 44/22 28 42 66.66 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 29/40 30 62 48.38 2 MEL MCCLELLAND W 40/29 28 54 51.85 (Was 45%) TOTALS W 11 L 3 298 620 48.06 4 ERVIN ALBERT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/13 15 42 35.71 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 41/37 25 66 37.87 5 TED PETERS L 39/42 19 68 27.94 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/23 16 58 27.58 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 31/40 18 58 31.03 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 25/42 19 52 36.53 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 8/41 10 34 29.41 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 42/19 15 44 34.09 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 43/35 30 56 53.57 5 TED PETERS W 45/18 25 50 50.00 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/14 12 44 27.27 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 22/44 21 42 50.00 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 26/40 19 44 43.18 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 25/41 22 56 39.28 (Was 43%) TOTALS W 7 L 7 266 714 37.25 5 TED PETERS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 14/41 8 44 18.18 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 12/42 13 44 29.54 4 ERVIN ALBERT W 42/39 16 68 23.52 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 21/42 14 46 30.43 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 40/35 16 64 25.00 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 28/44 9 50 18.00 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/26 13 48 27.08 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 16/41 13 42 30.95 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 12/40 13 36 36.11 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 18/45 15 50 30.00 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 24/43 14 40 35.00 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 42/34 26 62 41.93 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 42/32 17 56 30.35 7 JACK LESLIE L 33/40 18 52 34.61 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 5 L 9 205 702 29.20 6* TED KUPFERSHMID - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 13/40 9 42 21.42 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 23/43 16 46 34.78 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 12/44 9 48 18.75 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 20/41 13 48 27.08 7 JACK LESLIE L 31/43 15 56 26.78 5 TED PETERS W 44/28 14 50 28.00 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 29/40 15 48 31.25 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 19/42 9 44 20.45 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 5/43 5 34 14.70 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 8/41 6 30 20.00 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 14/40 14 38 36.84 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/39 14 46 30.43 5 TED PETERS L 32/42 14 56 25.00 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 41/27 21 76 27.63 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 3 L 11 174 662 26.28 7* JACK LESLIE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 14/40 9 38 23.68 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 16/40 10 38 26.31 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 0/40 4 20 20.00 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 23/40 10 58 17.24 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 43/31 21 56 37.50 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON W 40/29 19 58 32.75 5 TED PETERS L 26/40 10 48 20.83 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 23/40 14 44 31.81 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 5/40 5 32 15.62 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 1/40 1 26 3.84 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 14/40 6 44 13.63 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 39/40 14 46 30.43 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON L 36/40 22 74 29.72 5 TED PETERS W 40/33 20 52 38.46 (Was 32%) TOTALS W 3 L 11 165 634 26.02 8 EMIL GUSTAFSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 15/41 10 36 27.77 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 37/41 22 66 33.33 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 12/40 9 32 28.12 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 22/42 19 50 38.00 5 TED PETERS L 35/40 20 64 31.25 7 JACK LESLIE L 29/40 16 58 27.58 6 TED KUPFERSHMID W 40/29 17 48 35.41 1 RUSSELL ELLIOTT L 31/40 17 48 35.41 4 ERVIN ALBERT L 35/43 27 56 48.21 3 HERMAN HAUGLAND L 19/41 14 40 35.00 2 MEL MCCLELLAND L 28/45 18 50 36.00 5 TED PETERS L 34/42 22 62 35.48 7 JACK LESLIE W 40/36 20 74 27.02 6 TED KUPFERSHMID L 27/41 21 76 27.63 (Was 33%) TOTALS W 2 L 12 252 760 33.15 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS C (35 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 MARCEL PINETTE BC 4210 10 0 373 151 370 40.81% 2 GARRY RAYNER BC 0740 7 3 296 122 426 28.63% 3 FRED MELN BC 2821 5 5 260 90 438 20.54% 4* ED MORIGEAU BC 0800 3 7 292 109 464 23.49% 5* DON NELSON BC 0564 3 7 276 112 550 20.36% 6 BUD PERRY BC 3406 2 8 214 95 488 19.46% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 MARCEL PINETTE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 ED MORIGEAU W 36/22 16 44 36.36 6 BUD PERRY W 35/1 12 22 54.54 5 DON NELSON W 36/21 18 48 37.50 2 GARRY RAYNER W 37/7 13 34 38.23 3 FRED MELN W 37/5 13 34 38.23 4 ED MORIGEAU W 36/27 14 42 33.33 6 BUD PERRY W 40/11 16 30 53.33 5 DON NELSON W 37/15 11 32 34.37 2 GARRY RAYNER W 39/27 23 50 46.00 3 FRED MELN W 40/7 15 34 44.11 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 10 L 0 151 370 40.81 2 GARRY RAYNER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 FRED MELN W 38/21 13 38 34.21 4 ED MORIGEAU W 36/32 16 50 32.00 6 BUD PERRY W 37/8 9 40 22.50 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 7/37 4 34 11.76 5 DON NELSON W 36/27 15 52 28.84 3 FRED MELN L 10/38 5 34 14.70 4 ED MORIGEAU W 35/13 13 26 50.00 6 BUD PERRY W 35/26 15 44 34.09 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 27/39 17 50 34.00 5 DON NELSON W 35/21 15 58 25.86 (Was 29%) TOTALS W 7 L 3 122 426 28.63 3 FRED MELN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 GARRY RAYNER L 21/38 7 38 18.42 5 DON NELSON L 19/40 9 40 22.50 4 ED MORIGEAU W 35/28 14 58 24.13 6 BUD PERRY W 35/23 8 44 18.18 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 5/37 2 34 5.88 2 GARRY RAYNER W 38/10 12 34 35.29 5 DON NELSON W 35/33 8 56 14.28 4 ED MORIGEAU L 30/35 14 44 31.81 6 BUD PERRY W 35/24 11 56 19.64 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 7/40 5 34 14.70 (Was 30%) TOTALS W 5 L 5 90 438 20.54 4* ED MORIGEAU - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 22/36 10 44 22.72 2 GARRY RAYNER L 32/36 13 50 26.00 3 FRED MELN L 28/35 9 58 15.51 5 DON NELSON W 36/32 8 60 13.33 6 BUD PERRY L 30/35 8 52 15.38 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 27/36 12 42 28.57 2 GARRY RAYNER L 13/35 6 26 23.07 3 FRED MELN W 35/30 14 44 31.81 5 DON NELSON L 33/35 13 46 28.26 6 BUD PERRY W 36/17 16 42 38.09 (Was 23%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 109 464 23.49 5* DON NELSON - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 6 BUD PERRY W 35/34 14 116 12.06 3 FRED MELN W 40/19 16 40 40.00 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 21/36 14 48 29.16 4 ED MORIGEAU L 32/36 10 60 16.66 2 GARRY RAYNER L 27/36 9 52 17.30 6 BUD PERRY L 17/35 5 42 11.90 3 FRED MELN L 33/35 11 56 19.64 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 15/37 5 32 15.62 4 ED MORIGEAU W 35/33 15 46 32.60 2 GARRY RAYNER L 21/35 13 58 22.41 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 3 L 7 112 550 20.36 6 BUD PERRY - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 DON NELSON L 34/35 15 116 12.93 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 1/35 3 22 13.63 2 GARRY RAYNER L 8/37 3 40 7.50 3 FRED MELN L 23/35 7 44 15.90 4 ED MORIGEAU W 35/30 12 52 23.07 5 DON NELSON W 35/17 11 42 26.19 1 MARCEL PINETTE L 11/40 7 30 23.33 2 GARRY RAYNER L 26/35 14 44 31.81 3 FRED MELN L 24/35 11 56 19.64 4 ED MORIGEAU L 17/36 12 42 28.57 (Was 25%) TOTALS W 2 L 8 95 488 19.46 ELDERS 30 FEET - CLASS D (25 Points) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 ED NICKEL BC 4753 10 2 287 88 420 20.95% 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN BC 0554 7 5 255 89 426 20.89% 3 JOHN MERRIMAN BC 0565 4 8 233 80 478 16.73% 4 CECIL GRIESE BC 1619 3 9 202 56 444 12.61% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 ED NICKEL - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/10 6 38 15.78 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 25/21 8 24 33.33 4 CECIL GRIESE W 25/13 5 28 17.85 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/14 5 38 13.15 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 25/9 5 28 17.85 4 CECIL GRIESE W 25/15 6 40 15.00 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 27/23 11 42 26.19 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 10/25 5 28 17.85 4 CECIL GRIESE L 22/28 10 40 25.00 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/9 8 28 28.57 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 26/13 12 36 33.33 4 CECIL GRIESE W 27/17 7 50 14.00 (Was 18%) TOTALS W 10 L 2 88 420 20.95 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 CECIL GRIESE W 27/8 8 26 30.76 1 ED NICKEL L 21/25 7 24 29.16 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/14 11 48 22.91 4 CECIL GRIESE W 28/24 7 46 15.21 1 ED NICKEL L 9/25 2 28 7.14 3 JOHN MERRIMAN L 15/27 3 56 5.35 4 CECIL GRIESE W 27/20 7 38 18.42 1 ED NICKEL W 25/10 10 28 35.71 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/15 12 36 33.33 4 CECIL GRIESE W 25/4 8 22 36.36 1 ED NICKEL L 13/26 10 36 27.77 3 JOHN MERRIMAN L 15/30 4 38 10.52 (Was 21%) TOTALS W 7 L 5 89 426 20.89 3 JOHN MERRIMAN - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 1 ED NICKEL L 10/25 4 38 10.52 4 CECIL GRIESE W 25/8 6 28 21.42 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 14/25 7 48 14.58 1 ED NICKEL L 14/25 6 38 15.78 4 CECIL GRIESE W 27/14 8 36 22.22 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 27/15 7 56 12.50 1 ED NICKEL L 23/27 12 42 28.57 4 CECIL GRIESE L 17/25 7 48 14.58 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 15/25 7 36 19.44 1 ED NICKEL L 9/25 4 28 14.28 4 CECIL GRIESE L 22/26 3 42 7.14 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN W 30/15 9 38 23.68 (Was 19%) TOTALS W 4 L 8 80 478 16.73 4 CECIL GRIESE - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 8/27 3 26 11.53 3 JOHN MERRIMAN L 8/25 1 28 3.57 1 ED NICKEL L 13/25 5 28 17.85 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 24/28 5 46 10.86 3 JOHN MERRIMAN L 14/27 5 36 13.88 1 ED NICKEL L 15/25 4 40 10.00 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 20/27 4 38 10.52 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 25/17 6 48 12.50 1 ED NICKEL W 28/22 9 40 22.50 2 ARDEN WEIDMAN L 4/25 2 22 9.09 3 JOHN MERRIMAN W 26/22 5 42 11.90 1 ED NICKEL L 17/27 7 50 14.00 (Was 14%) TOTALS W 3 L 9 56 444 12.61 J U N I O R S - CLASS A (40 Shoes) PLACE N A M E WON LOST SCORE RINGERS SHOES PERCENT 1 RANDY SCHAEFER BC 0404 11 1 449 189 484 39.04% 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT BC 0503 9 3 313 98 480 20.41% 3* ZANE TOUSIGNANT BC 0504 5 7 278 92 484 19.00% 4* DAVID HARRIS BC 5 7 252 83 480 17.29% 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER BC 0509 0 12 165 44 480 9.16% ( # INDICATES A PLAYOFF FOR 1st PLACE - MATCHED SETS OF STARS DENOTE TIES) > > > I N D I V I D U A L G A M E R E S U L T S < < < 1 RANDY SCHAEFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 42/11 13 40 32.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 27/25 15 44 34.09 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 25/27 8 40 20.00 4 DAVID HARRIS W 33/23 15 40 37.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 61/6 23 40 57.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 47/18 22 40 55.00 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 51/21 21 40 52.50 4 DAVID HARRIS W 44/6 16 40 40.00 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 24/17 12 40 30.00 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 32/14 15 40 37.50 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 24/15 14 40 35.00 4 DAVID HARRIS W 39/13 15 40 37.50 (Was 50%) TOTALS W 11 L 1 189 484 39.04 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 4 DAVID HARRIS W 30/21 10 40 25.00 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 31/15 9 40 22.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER W 27/25 6 40 15.00 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 30/17 10 40 25.00 4 DAVID HARRIS W 23/11 3 40 7.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 25/15 8 40 20.00 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 21/51 11 40 27.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 28/21 9 40 22.50 4 DAVID HARRIS W 31/15 10 40 25.00 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 28/17 5 40 12.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 15/24 10 40 25.00 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 24/26 7 40 17.50 (Was 13%) TOTALS W 9 L 3 98 480 20.41 3* ZANE TOUSIGNANT - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 26/22 11 40 27.50 4 DAVID HARRIS L 22/33 6 40 15.00 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 25/27 12 44 27.27 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 17/30 5 40 12.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 25/16 5 40 12.50 4 DAVID HARRIS W 24/16 5 40 12.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 18/47 13 40 32.50 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 21/28 5 40 12.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 40/6 10 40 25.00 4 DAVID HARRIS L 20/21 3 40 7.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 14/32 9 40 22.50 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT W 26/24 8 40 20.00 (Was 12%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 92 484 19.00 4* DAVID HARRIS - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 21/30 7 40 17.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 33/22 11 40 27.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 22/14 4 40 10.00 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 23/33 12 40 30.00 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 11/23 2 40 5.00 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 16/24 6 40 15.00 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 37/11 11 40 27.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 6/44 4 40 10.00 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 15/31 8 40 20.00 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT W 21/20 5 40 12.50 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER W 34/15 9 40 22.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 13/39 4 40 10.00 (Was 20%) TOTALS W 5 L 7 83 480 17.29 5 RAQUEL SCHAEFER - BC OPPONENT W/L SCORE Rs SHOES R% 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 22/26 8 40 20.00 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 11/42 2 40 5.00 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 15/31 5 40 12.50 4 DAVID HARRIS L 14/22 3 40 7.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 16/25 2 40 5.00 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 6/61 5 40 12.50 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 15/25 2 40 5.00 4 DAVID HARRIS L 11/37 1 40 2.50 3 ZANE TOUSIGNANT L 6/40 3 40 7.50 1 RANDY SCHAEFER L 17/24 8 40 20.00 2 JOHN TOUSIGNANT L 17/28 3 40 7.50 4 DAVID HARRIS L 15/34 2 40 5.00 (Was 3%) TOTALS W 0 L 12 44 480 9.16